Sarevok or Valygar??
Sarevok or Valygar??
I'm just starting ToB. Who would be a better tank? The only thing i use valygar for is tank, nothing else and he kinda sucks at it. i always have to move him aside or waste all my healing potions on him. would sarevok be a better tank?
- Phantom Lord
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Exiled - yet ...
- Contact:
I agree, pure fighters rule, so take Sarevok. I don't think that Sarevok rivals Korgan (if Korgan is using a *certain* hammer and is upgraded to grand mastery in war hammers) but he's great. BTW, Mazzy's worth a try too, since there a lots of strenght increasing items in TOB and a very nice short sword as well.
- incandescent one
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Fortress of Regrets
- Contact:
I'd go with sarevok, valygar isn't made for tanking
If I asked, would you answer? Its your problem. Its a deep, deep problem. I have no way to ask about that... I have no elegant way of stepping into your heart without tracking in filth. So I will wait. Someday, when you want to tell me, tell me then. -Bleach
Sarevok is a far better tank than just about any other NPC in the game with the possible exception of Korgan.
Valygar on the other hand isn't really a tank at all, he's a stalker. I personnally use hime in much the same way as I use a thief in combat, sneak him up behind enemies and backstab. Now he isn't as good at back stabbing as a theif but the advantage with him is that after making the strike he can take a couple of hits without having to run away.
Valygar on the other hand isn't really a tank at all, he's a stalker. I personnally use hime in much the same way as I use a thief in combat, sneak him up behind enemies and backstab. Now he isn't as good at back stabbing as a theif but the advantage with him is that after making the strike he can take a couple of hits without having to run away.
Just remember, everyone is entitled to my opinion
Best armors in the game are the Dragon Scales, which Valygar can use. He has good Dex and fights well with two weapons. Strength 17 or 18/77 is pretty irrelevant with all the Strength enhancing items around. On top of that, he has some extras like Stealth and funny spells.
The one thing that bothers me about Sarevok is his uber-specialization in Two-Handed Weapons. Those suck compared to dual wielding, and perhaps even compared to Weapon & Shield. I mean, would you rather use one +5 item, or two?
The one thing that bothers me about Sarevok is his uber-specialization in Two-Handed Weapons. Those suck compared to dual wielding, and perhaps even compared to Weapon & Shield. I mean, would you rather use one +5 item, or two?
[url="http://www.sorcerers.net/Games/BG2/SpellsReference/Main.htm"]Baldur's Gate 2 Spells Reference[/url]: Strategy, tips, tricks, bugs, cheese and corrections to the manual.
1d8 or 1d10 is only one point apart on average. Since you're hitting for 20+ with Strength and magic damage modifiers anyway, I'd say it's very inconsequential.Originally posted by nael:
<STRONG>yeah, but two handed weapons do more damage and usually do cooler things to compensate for the lack of an extra weapon or shield.</STRONG>
As for the cooler abilities... Carsomyr is nice, but none of the other two-handers compare to, for example, the Axe of the Unyielding. Just pick any nice dual wield combo, add all the abilities together, and try to find a two-hander that gives you something comparable.
[url="http://www.sorcerers.net/Games/BG2/SpellsReference/Main.htm"]Baldur's Gate 2 Spells Reference[/url]: Strategy, tips, tricks, bugs, cheese and corrections to the manual.
- BilboTheHobbit
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Contact: