Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

Solo Pure Bard

This forum is to be used for all discussions pertaining to Black Isle Studios' Icewind Dale II.
Post Reply
User avatar
Heidrek
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 6:47 pm
Contact:

Solo Pure Bard

Post by Heidrek »

Ok, by now everyone probably knows that I love the Bard class. I'm Soloing with a Fighter/Bard at the moment and wondering what a pure bard would be like.

So here's the place to give your feedback, potential problem areas and solutions. I'd also like ideas on the best Race options. I'm thinking about Human for the bonus feat and skill points so I don't have to put so many point into Int., but Asamiir and Drow hold some appeal too. I'd consider Deep Gnomes for their inate buffs, spell resistance and AC bonus, but the Charisma penalty is too steep.
[url="http://www.mortgagedetroitmichigan.com"]Detroit Mortgage[/url] [url="http://www.evansvilleinforeclosures.com"]Evansville Indiana Foreclosures[/url] [url="http://www.denvercoforeclosures.net"]Denver Co Foreclosures[/url]
User avatar
Opalescence
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:13 pm
Location: In the Sixth Door of the Chamber of Doors.
Contact:

Post by Opalescence »

Well, really I feel that a bard's the best for soloing, because he's a thief/sorceror/diplomat. But the problem with soloing is that you can only rely on you, and so you really want to cover your bases as much as possible. Because of this, I'd still say that fighter/bard is the way to go, since the fighter levels will make up for the bards lack of serious combat ability. For pure bard, I'd suggest Aasimar since the -2 Constitution hit really hurts when you're soloing, since you've got to act as your own tank. Here's my own preferred solo build:

Level 1: Rogue
- lots of skill points
Level 2: Fighter
- Hold your own in combat
Level 3: Bard
- round out
Level 4: Bard
- spells
Level 5: Bard
- more spells
Level 6: Fighter
- combat ability
Level 7: Rogue
- evasion
Level 8: Rogue
- uncanny dodge
Level 9: Fighter
- combat ability
Level 10: Fighter
- Weapon Specialization
Level 11+: Bard
- casting, etc.

I believe this build isn't weak at any point, and has enough to hold its own.

Personally, there really isn't anything wrong with replacing the bard levels with Cleric, and indeed might be better since if you replace it with Demarch of Mask, you get Free Blind-Fight feat and +1 bonus to Hide, Move Silently, and Pick Pockets, and thus you can cast (Cleric levels), fight (Cleric can cast in armor, Bard can't), and do roguish things (rogue levels, +1 hide, move silently, and pickpocket).
"Unlimited technology from all over the universe, and we cruise around in a Ford POS."
- Agent J, Men in Black

Do you feel the Call?
User avatar
Heidrek
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 6:47 pm
Contact:

Post by Heidrek »

I agree that a Fighter/Bard would be a better option, I'm soloing with one at the monent. You lose nothing really by giving the Bard a few fighter levels and gain quite a bit (extra feats, hp, proficiencies and attack bonus plus the option to spec. and use fighter only equip.).

I am interested though in whether the 'weaker' pure bard can still suceed in Normal (insane difficulty) and HoF modes. I think he can if he's played and developed properly. I'm thinking of going with either Human or as you mention Asamiir (for the net +4 attrib points). He can always use Bulls Strength to up his Str and Eagles Spelendor for Cha. an Asamiir would look something like:

Str:18 Int:10 Wis:3 Dex:15 Con:16 Cha:18
[url="http://www.mortgagedetroitmichigan.com"]Detroit Mortgage[/url] [url="http://www.evansvilleinforeclosures.com"]Evansville Indiana Foreclosures[/url] [url="http://www.denvercoforeclosures.net"]Denver Co Foreclosures[/url]
User avatar
Brynn
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Zul'Gurub
Contact:

Post by Brynn »

I'm still very sceptic about his efficiency in battle...
Up the IRONS!
User avatar
Wrath-Of-Egg
Posts: 1147
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 9:30 am
Location: Finland.. or on that other place..

Post by Wrath-Of-Egg »

Brynn just try it.. and have fun..
_________

How can you say no to this face? :D

But seriusly.. Party without Bard is not party...

I can understand that SYM forum.. mentally 6 year old people is just running around with scissors on their hand.

Last edited by Wrath-Of-Egg : Today
User avatar
winter sorrow
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:15 am
Contact:

Post by winter sorrow »

If you want to go for a pure bard, I find that drow is the best choice. Having 16 con is plenty for soloing. The main reasons for the drow choice are immunity to sleep spells (includes command), spell resistance and an effective +4 bonus to will saves v enchantment spells. These really do help you survive in the early-mid game: until you get the summons spells, a held bard is almost as good as dead.
User avatar
ishuman
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:03 pm
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post by ishuman »

No doubt that those racial bonuses would be nice. But I wonder if this isn't a situation where that extra skill point for humans could be the deciding factor. If you don't mind min/maxing the stats humans can get a lot of extra ability points by dropping INT and still get at least 2/level.

What skill points would your solo bard need?
User avatar
Heidrek
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 6:47 pm
Contact:

Post by Heidrek »

To be able to make the most of his abilities the Bard would need plenty of points in Knowledge: Arcana, UMD and Concentration. This means a fair amount of skill points will be needed.

Drow is an intersting choice. The Spell Resistance and extra ability points are very nice, the only real down sides are the day blindness and vulerability to fire blinding. How would you allocate Stats?
[url="http://www.mortgagedetroitmichigan.com"]Detroit Mortgage[/url] [url="http://www.evansvilleinforeclosures.com"]Evansville Indiana Foreclosures[/url] [url="http://www.denvercoforeclosures.net"]Denver Co Foreclosures[/url]
Post Reply