attacks per round?
attacks per round?
my assassin with a normal sword gets 1 in 2 why is this.
I found out because i finnaly got both kundane and belm which should give me 4 per round so i decided to check by having it auto pause at every round end and i only attack 2 times per round.
hope somebody has a minute to explain
thanks
I found out because i finnaly got both kundane and belm which should give me 4 per round so i decided to check by having it auto pause at every round end and i only attack 2 times per round.
hope somebody has a minute to explain
thanks
I didn't really bounce Eeyore. I had a cough, and I happened to be behind Eeyore, and I said "Grrrr-oppp-ptschschschz."
Tigger
Tigger
Don't know. Probabily if you get a normal weapon your rate do not decrease as you supose, or maybe is happen some bug thing. Don't know.
But about this topic, I have a stupid question, if anyone can help me it will be nice. When a character is welding two swords and makes an attack( from my view his movement involve both arms) it means that he attack with the both arms( both weapon) or only one??? And so a dualwelding character has automaticaly a dobble ratting of attacks, or only the tangencial bonus garanted for the weapons( like fire resistance)???
Basicaly the question is so stupid that i'm feeling bad. I know.
But about this topic, I have a stupid question, if anyone can help me it will be nice. When a character is welding two swords and makes an attack( from my view his movement involve both arms) it means that he attack with the both arms( both weapon) or only one??? And so a dualwelding character has automaticaly a dobble ratting of attacks, or only the tangencial bonus garanted for the weapons( like fire resistance)???
Basicaly the question is so stupid that i'm feeling bad. I know.
[Sorry about my English]
Ps: I'm "Ivan Cavallazzi".
Lurker(0.50). : )
Ps: I'm "Ivan Cavallazzi".
Lurker(0.50). : )
Sorry Tom, I don't know what the answer to that is. I've found weird things with number of attacks as well so maybe someone else could comment.
To Ivan, dual wielding gives you 1 attack per round with your off-hand weapon (your left hand in BG). Thus, if you would normally get 2 attacks/round with your main weapon, you get 3 total attacks/round (2 main, 1 off) if you are dual-wielding. The only exception to this is if you get certain weapons that say in their description that they give an extra attack per round, which means that you would get 2 attacks with your off hand.
It's not a stupid question at all.
To Ivan, dual wielding gives you 1 attack per round with your off-hand weapon (your left hand in BG). Thus, if you would normally get 2 attacks/round with your main weapon, you get 3 total attacks/round (2 main, 1 off) if you are dual-wielding. The only exception to this is if you get certain weapons that say in their description that they give an extra attack per round, which means that you would get 2 attacks with your off hand.
It's not a stupid question at all.
"But I also made it clear to [Vladimir Putin] that it's important to think beyond the old days of when we had the concept that if we blew each other up, the world would be safe." -President George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., May 1, 2001
- King Leoric
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
- Contact:
@Doltan
i think that if you equip weapons such as belm, the extra attack always goes to the main weapon, and, no matter what, except (impr) haste (this spells seem to be bugged, i know for sure that in ToB, impr haste doesn't do ANYTHING to your number of attacks - just check with the auto-pause), you'll always have one attack on your off-hand.
@ Ivan
The animation always show you attacking with both weapons, no matter with wich hand the attack is being made... i guess the programmers were just too lazy...
and also, Onde vc mora, cara?
i think that if you equip weapons such as belm, the extra attack always goes to the main weapon, and, no matter what, except (impr) haste (this spells seem to be bugged, i know for sure that in ToB, impr haste doesn't do ANYTHING to your number of attacks - just check with the auto-pause), you'll always have one attack on your off-hand.
@ Ivan
The animation always show you attacking with both weapons, no matter with wich hand the attack is being made... i guess the programmers were just too lazy...
and also, Onde vc mora, cara?
Being an Evil Overlord seems to be a good career choice. It pays well, there are all sorts of perks and you can set your own hours. However every Evil Overlord I've read about in books or seen in movies invariably gets overthrown and destroyed in the end. I've noticed that no matter whether they are barbarian lords, deranged wizards, mad scientists or alien invaders, they always seem to make the same basic mistakes every single time. Therefore, if I ever happen to become an Evil Overlord, ...
http://br.geocities.com/medicina011/
http://br.geocities.com/medicina011/
Just a little tidbit of info.... Your offhand is always facing you. Let me explain, your character equips a shield and faces left, the shield faces you. you turn your character to face right..... low and behold the shield faces you! The same is true when you have weapons in your offhand. I guess the animators didn't want to make different animations for each facing and instead just reversed one to the other.....
Don't forget that attacks per round are also capped, at least before spells like Improved Haste, or things like potions of speed.
Max of 4 per round normally.
I had a game in which Korgan was wielding an axe in each hand, with 5 slots in Axe, and got 4 per 1, but when I removed one axe and equipped a shield he got - lo and behold - 4 per 1.
Of course Whirlwind Attack and Greater Whirlwind Attack render attacks per round moot once you get them.
Max of 4 per round normally.
I had a game in which Korgan was wielding an axe in each hand, with 5 slots in Axe, and got 4 per 1, but when I removed one axe and equipped a shield he got - lo and behold - 4 per 1.
Of course Whirlwind Attack and Greater Whirlwind Attack render attacks per round moot once you get them.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
P.ath o.f M.ost R.esistance
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
- No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style. (Vlad Taltos - in the book Jhereg by Steven Brust)
P.ath o.f M.ost R.esistance
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
- No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style. (Vlad Taltos - in the book Jhereg by Steven Brust)
- Uther Pendragon
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Avalon
- Contact:
Along the same topic line. Has anybody ever checked to see if the game ACTUALLY gives the number of attacks per round it claims in the record page?
I was counting the times my guys were hitting the enemies and something didn't add up. So, to test my theory I stripped all the armor from an NPC and turned AI off. Turned on end of round auto-pause and attack roll info/text.
Record page said 4 APR total (assumed 3 right 1 left). According to battle text what actually occurred was this:
Round 1 - Right hand attack 2x
Round 2 - Left 1x - Right 1x
Round 3 - Right 2x
I don't get it. Has anybody else done this? Can other ppl try it and report their findings? If I'm the only one, then it must be a bug. If others find the same results , then we're getting robbed of valuable attacks per round.
[ 08-08-2001: Message edited by: Uther Pendragon ]
I was counting the times my guys were hitting the enemies and something didn't add up. So, to test my theory I stripped all the armor from an NPC and turned AI off. Turned on end of round auto-pause and attack roll info/text.
Record page said 4 APR total (assumed 3 right 1 left). According to battle text what actually occurred was this:
Round 1 - Right hand attack 2x
Round 2 - Left 1x - Right 1x
Round 3 - Right 2x
I don't get it. Has anybody else done this? Can other ppl try it and report their findings? If I'm the only one, then it must be a bug. If others find the same results , then we're getting robbed of valuable attacks per round.
[ 08-08-2001: Message edited by: Uther Pendragon ]
Uther Pendragon ~ Knight Of The Old Code
ehmm.. well yes me - thats why i started the topic. the stat page says i have 4 attacks with belm and kundane but when i count with auto-pause i have 2.I don't get it. Has anybody else done this? Can other ppl try it and report their findings? If I'm the only one, then it must be a bug. If others find the same results , then we're getting robbed of valuable attacks per round.
well does any one know whats going on???
I didn't really bounce Eeyore. I had a cough, and I happened to be behind Eeyore, and I said "Grrrr-oppp-ptschschschz."
Tigger
Tigger
If you think that's bad, equip a dual-wielding character with the boots of speed and pay attention to what happens with the off-hand attack. The same thing occurs with a hasted dual-wielder.
There's nothing a little poison couldn't cure...
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
When checking the character to see how many attacks i get i see that the boots of speed gives me half extra attack. However, i DONT get an extra half attack when using the gauntlets of master expertise, as i should. I know i cap at 4, so i gave them to Sarevk, who uses 2handeds and only get 3 attacks per round, but nothing still..
Sigurd, Crazed Cleric of Talos, Servant of Evil.
- Chade Fallstar
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2000 11:00 pm
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
- Contact:
about the gauntlets of extraordinary specialication:
I've noticed the same thing too. When I equipped them to Korgan who's dualwielding with 4 attack / round they didn't do anything =( - the same thing with Keldorn 3 attacks / 2H sword. BUT when I equipped 'em to my Ranger 9th / Cleric who previously was dualwielding with 3 attacks / round my attacks per round increased by 1 instead of ½. So now my PC has 4 attacks / round ...
bugged & strange?!?
I've noticed the same thing too. When I equipped them to Korgan who's dualwielding with 4 attack / round they didn't do anything =( - the same thing with Keldorn 3 attacks / 2H sword. BUT when I equipped 'em to my Ranger 9th / Cleric who previously was dualwielding with 3 attacks / round my attacks per round increased by 1 instead of ½. So now my PC has 4 attacks / round ...
bugged & strange?!?
Seen on a web page:
"This site best viewed in Netscape Explorer."
Customer: "I ran Microwave Defrost, but it didn't help."
(Referring to Microsoft Defrag.)
Customer: "I have Microsoft Exploder."
Customer: "I have Microscope Exploiter."
Customer: "I have Netscape Complicator."
Customer: "I have Netscape Regulator."
Customer: "Uhh...I have Newscape and Outlook Exposure."
"This site best viewed in Netscape Explorer."
Customer: "I ran Microwave Defrost, but it didn't help."
(Referring to Microsoft Defrag.)
Customer: "I have Microsoft Exploder."
Customer: "I have Microscope Exploiter."
Customer: "I have Netscape Complicator."
Customer: "I have Netscape Regulator."
Customer: "Uhh...I have Newscape and Outlook Exposure."
- Loredweller
- Posts: 1681
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2001 11:00 pm
- Location: Latvia
- Contact:
IMHO there the weapon speed factor should be counted. There is only 10 tacts in a round. Mastery (or grand) decreases speed factor by 1, IMO. However i remeber there was a short sword with speed factor 0, have anybody tried with this one?
L.
L.
Loredweller
-------------------
...for tomorrow never comes ...
-------------------
...for tomorrow never comes ...