Awakened From Slumber

TonyMontana1638 · Post by **TonyMontana1638** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:30 pm

[QUOTE=Ravager]It's that bad in the US too?

Or are you just trying to get me to visit you? :laugh:[/QUOTE]

Well it is that bad in the US. Much worse, really. But in all honesty I'm trying to get you to visit

.

Magrus · Post by **Magrus** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:30 pm

[QUOTE=Ravager]I say...since when did this turn into the Anti-Ravvy thread?

[/QUOTE]

Maxi isn't here any more for us to pick. Someone needs to take the heat. :laugh:

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:34 pm

Ahh, you have my sympathy Tony. Rest assured the UK has problems that don't involve 'snap'.

If I ever get round to visiting the US...that's a 'when' hopefully.

@Mag, BAH!!

:laugh:
Can't you find someone newer than me?

Magrus · Post by **Magrus** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:37 pm

[QUOTE=Ravager]@Mag, BAH!!

:laugh:
Can't you find someone newer than me?

[/QUOTE]

Normally I do go after Phreddie, but you're out of luck. He's not here.

Ah, don't worry, I'm too distracted to properly toss insults.

Curdis · Post by **Curdis** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:07 pm

[QUOTE=Ravager]Excellent. I am responsible for bringing the worst infection of SYM to date to fruition! Mwahaha! :devil:
(Yeah, that's the bunn-ays, not the other stuff I'm responsible for...)[/QUOTE]Your source for this blasphemy? I think you will finds that it was I would first introduced the humble bunny, although I will stand to be corrected, given sufficent evidence. - Curdis !

Hill-Shatar · Post by **Hill-Shatar** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:44 pm

Your lovely bunnies are totally different than the scourge set on SYM introduced by Ravager called the Bunn-ay.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:47 pm

Can I see proof of these so-called 'lovely' bunnies of Curdis'?

The Bunn-ay is not a scourge! Unless you call Queen a scourge, of course. Then they're on an equal footing.

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:18 pm

and you dont call Queen a scourge? In her final days the SF was just a Queen/Bunn-ay mongering hall!

TonyMontana1638 · Post by **TonyMontana1638** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:31 pm

[QUOTE=Phreddie]and you dont call Queen a scourge? In her final days the SF was just a Queen/Bunn-ay mongering hall!

[/QUOTE]

Hmmmm... Queen bred with bunnays equals...

*Gasp*

ChusRav! The adorable, pseudo-innocent creation that births punctuation at an unbearably rapid rate and capable of spamming 24/7 and averaging 3700 posts per day!

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:34 pm

dont forget that the Ravus can't sing worth a sack of balogna!

Witch King · Post by **Witch King** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:16 pm

Stop Ubikking Up This Thread

the moderators asked me to pass this bit of info along. any posts of one sentence or less are simply SPAM. and while spam certainly has its place, SYM is certainly not it.

please return to the original intent of the thread.

that is all.

Hill-Shatar · Post by **Hill-Shatar** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:35 pm

the moderators asked me to pass this bit of info along. any posts of one sentence or less are simply SPAM.

Why, amazing. I'll be sure to use-

-two-

-sentences in each post from now on.

and while spam certainly has its place, SYM is certainly not it.

Of course not certainly. It's more of a mix of misty posting considered spam, and other stuff that's more serious. There is nothing certain about it, dear WK.

that is all.

All what? Are you finished? What a relief, you are making so little sense.

ik911 · Post by **ik911** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:45 pm

[QUOTE=Witch King]the moderators asked me to pass this bit of info along. any posts of one sentence or less are simply SPAM. and while spam certainly has its place, SYM is certainly not it.

please return to the original intent of the thread.

that is all.[/QUOTE]
Quantifying post quality are we? There's plenty of examples in this very thread in which members of the afore-imagined WWWK post replies the length of merely one sentence.

Maybe a certain amount of characters defines 'SPAM' better? Say, under 100 characters, a post may be regarded as off-topic 'SPAM'?

I agree with you that the last couple of months people are quite unable in keeping to the thread intent, but it has been discussed, among other things. However, it seems you missed that.

Furthermore, I want to apologize for my unrespectful behavior. I was convinced you would not return after you announced you had returned.

I welcome you back to SYM and bow politely.

Luis Antonio · Post by **Luis Antonio** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:48 pm

[QUOTE=Hill-Shatar]
All what? Are you finished? What a relief, you are making so little sense.

[/QUOTE]

Yes.

[QUOTE=ik911]I welcome you back to SYM and bow politely.[/QUOTE]

*slap*

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:37 pm

[QUOTE=Witch King]please return to the original intent of the thread.
[/QUOTE]

Yeah...what was that?
The 'All bow in reverence for the great, the unheard of Witch King has returned' thread?

Well, what can I say...oh, I know...Joy.

Hill-Shatar · Post by **Hill-Shatar** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:42 pm

WK is getting rusty. He isn't exactly holding his own, now is he?

Luis Antonio · Post by **Luis Antonio** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:46 pm

[QUOTE=Hill-Shatar]WK is getting rusty. He isn't exactly holding his own, now is he?

[/QUOTE]

Maybe he need to be oiled with a little of the Heathen Elixir, dont you think?

Poor boyo.

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:32 pm

Luis, you might want to let Hill do the oiling, Im not so sure that the WK wouldn't enjoy it coming from you, and it is Hills speciality, oiling up men of his nature that is. Ive got a match ready once your done.

Tar and Feathering is always quite effective as well...

Luis Antonio · Post by **Luis Antonio** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:14 pm

Hill is a what? He oils men?

Hill-Shatar · Post by **Hill-Shatar** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:20 pm

[QUOTE=Luis Antonio]Hill is a what? He oils men?

[/QUOTE]

Since when did you ever listen to Phreddie? :laugh: