[QUOTE=BallOfFire] Actual Lionheart question: If I am going to be some sort of a mage, what kind of spells should I get? Fire? Ice? I've never tried any of them.[/quote]
Well... Thought magic skills are all good in their own way. But I personally have found the most useful to be Ice magic, and the least useful to be Fire magic.
[QUOTE=BallOfFire]Does only Charisma affect mana capacity on level up, or Perception too?[/quote]
The manual says: 'Magic wielders use this ability (Perception) to understand their spirit, so Mana is partially determined by this attribute.'
[QUOTE=BallOfFire]Does casting speed increase in any way? At my current cast rate I could fire an arrow or two before casting a second time, so I'm wondering if I should get some ranged too or something.[/quote]
Casting speed is determined by how long it takes a spell to replenish before you can cast it again. This is NOT determined by the amount of mana you
have, but the amount of mana it takes to
cast the spell. So a spell that takes 10 mana to cast replenishes quite quickly, but a spell that costs 20, 40, 80, etc mana to cast will take a correspondingly longer time to replenish. However, you CAN cast other spells while it is replenishing.
[QUOTE=BallOfFire]How does unarmed work? What exactly does putting points into the skill do? Will it still be good if I put no points in it?[/quote]
Exactly the same as it does with other skills, of course - it improves it!
![Stick Out Tongue :p](./images/smilies/)
And no, if you put no points into
any skill, you will be rubbish at it.
[QUOTE=BallOfFire]Ewww... Dickens... one of those writers who everyone praises for a style that seems to have been designed to torture the reader until cognotive dissonance theory takes effect: you devote so much time and energy to his books that you need some way of justifying this to yourself, so you convince yourself that he is a good writer. Can you tell I'm majoring in Psychology? ^^[/quote]
Heh! I couldn't read Dickens now! But I loved the books when I was a kid. Back then, we loved lots of highly detailed description!
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/)
We didn't even imagine the instant gratification that TV has taught you younger people to expect! I doubt most of you could read the stuff we read back then.
[QUOTE=BallOfFire]As for the Da Vinci Code, I've heard that it is all myth presented as fact, and considering its popularity I feel the need to avoid it out of my rebellious nature.[/quote]
Never read it. It was recommended to me by some people, disparaged by others, and I decided there were other things I'd rather read. Currently I am reading Britain B.C. by Francis Pryor, which is fascinating.
[QUOTE=BallOfFire]As for it hard being able to imagine an ADHD boy reading a lot, try this: I used to read 15-20 hours per day, on the bus, while walking between classes, during classes, during lunch, at home, in bed, always. Every waking moment was devoted to reading, it was my entire life. [/quote]
That sounds like me as a child, teen, and even adult - though adulthood reading was limited by childrearing. And it makes it
very difficult for me to believe you suffer from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder!
[QUOTE=BallOfFire]I miss being able to immerse myself in the world of books like that, but I haven't been able to find any worth my time in the last few years. Ironically, Philosophy of Dummies was the only book worth the time I spent on it. That book changed my life, lol. It put into words and convincing arguments the things I had been considering all my life, so I finally was convinced of them.[/quote]
Meh. Psychology and Philosophy bore the socks off me. You learn more about people by observation and talking to them than you ever get out of a book, imo. Some such books talk an inordinate amount of rubbish! And the ideas propounded are constantly changing, too. Which the behaviour and inate nature of people doesn't.