Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

high or low stats

This forum is to be used for all discussions pertaining to Troika Games' Temple of Elemental Evil.
Post Reply
User avatar
vitosqueo
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:34 pm
Contact:

high or low stats

Post by vitosqueo »

in d&d you used to want a low armor class is seems like in this game you want a high score is that correct and is that the same for most other stats. an amor check penalty of -3 or a penalty of -1. which one of these is better or do you want one with a positive number?
User avatar
Lord Plothos
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Lord Plothos »

You want high AC and small penalties.
AC works like this: when you attack, you roll a d20 and add any modifiers. If you meet or exceed the AC of your target, you hit. Simple. So a high AC means your opponent has to roll better to hit you. (20 always hits).

Armor check penalties work like this: in most cases the check penalty is applied to a skill check. When you attempt to use a skill, you roll a d20 and add any modifiers for training, ability scores, etc.. Depending on how hard what you were trying to do is, there is a DC (difficulty class) number that functions a lot like AC in combat. You want to meet or exceed the DC of the task in question with your modified roll result. A high DC is something hard to do. An armor check penalty applies a negative modifier to your roll, making it harder to meet the DC, so you don't want that.

Example: you want to tumble around an enemy to avoid an attack of opportunity. You have 4 ranks in tumble and a 16 dex, for a total of +7 to your tumble check. However, you're carrying a heavy shield, which has a -2 armor check penalty. That means the total modifier to your roll is only +5. The DC to tumble past a single enemy is 15, so you'd have to roll a 10 or better to succeed.
Proud user and advocate of [url="http://rptools.net/doku.php?id=maptool:intro"]MapTool[/url]for all my RPing-at-a-distance.
(Use the lastest 1.3 build - it's still beta, but stable and far better than 1.2)
Post Reply