The Succeeder Stronghold

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:11 am

Yep, I'd say that falls firmly under the heading.

I'm just glad I'm finished with my Programming until the exam, it might not get a great mark, but at least it's done.

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:13 am

That's the spirit!

In one and a bit weeks, I'll be on holidays

.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:17 am

And I'll be on holiday from this Friday for three weeks.

So, how's your camel game going?

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:19 am

I 'think' I've completed the Pseudo code. Then I can hand it in from Thursday to Tuesday... and if not then, then not until next term when it's due. I'll get it handed in early, in the hope I can hand two drafts in

... I'll probably need it.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:20 am

Well, if you want to send me a copy of it, I wouldn't mind checking it over.

If you have an electronic copy, of course.

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:26 am

It's a computer subject, isn't it?

If you really want to read it...

Thanks heaps if you do.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:33 am

Sometimes they still demand a paper copy though.

Okay, just having a look through, I notice you haven't got any READ statement first off...

I'm just trying to copy the Pseudocode pages out of that electronic workbook for you, maybe that'll help you too...

I think it's about 8 pages.

EDIT: Sorted.

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:34 am

Well I don't think we do the READ statement. I'll have a look through some of the stuff we have done, and see what I can find.

Thanks for that.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:36 am

Okay, I'll read through your code in more depth then...and see the document I attached to my last post.

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:40 am

Now I'm confused. We haven't ever covered READ in our class... but this thingy we were given has it. I guess I'll put it in, and see what happens.

Whoa, that thing looks pretty indepth. I'll have to go through that carefully... probably tomorrow when I'm in the mood. Thanks for that.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:45 am

I'd be surprised if you don't have to cover READ, it's a bit like the Pseudo way of declaring variables.

A lot of it is examples, especially the last few pages. It has all the commands and operators at the beginning.
Good luck with it...

Here's my take on that code.

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:49 am

Alright, well READs are now in, and I also discovered I had missed out some DISPLAY commands. So I've fixed that up also.

We probably do, but she has just never mentioned it... and seeing as it is a draft, I might as well.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:51 am

Okay, well, I pointed out a couple of things in the document I attached too. I can't really stick in more DISPLAY statements as you'd get that from looking at the Java, but I'm pretty sure the +=/-= can be reduced to +/- and there's a few other things in there too.

One thing, on the 6th line, should turns+=1 go in an IF statement? And should just be +1 I think.

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:52 am

Well I need to maintain some of the standards of class... otherwise I end up being docked for plagarism

.

So I'll leave the +/- because she taught us that style, so I'd better not change, for fear of repurcussions.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:54 am

Fair enough, I'm not 100% sure on that anyway.
Just look at te comments I included after the //'s then.

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:59 am

Oh, I didn't realise you had attached that document.

Thanks (and nice use of Java style comments

).

I'm fixing it up now... and the 'Reset all variables' is simply a case of me being lazy.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:00 am

Yeah, the comments are the same in C++ and ActionScript, so it's just easier to use those.

*nods* I thought so, but it was worth me pointing out anyway.

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:03 am

Yeah, I have a knack of forgetting to fix things up... cost me a bit on a Maths assignment, I had [] brackets, but forget to turn them into a sqaure root bracket

.

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:05 am

Hehe. It's easy to forget small things like that...

dj_venom · Post by **dj_venom** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:08 am

So what about your coding project? Do you have the .exe handy?