No, his actions regarding sex should involve only his wife.Originally posted by Vivien:
<STRONG>Because if he's married, his thoughts regarding sex should have his wife somewhere in there.</STRONG>
*cough* *splutter* Darn! I spilled my coffee!<STRONG>I am not a sexual fantasy, I am a human being.</STRONG>
*whistles inocently*<STRONG>Am I making sense at all? I'm being very honest here, it makes me uncomfortable when an older married man ogles. Looking is fine. Leering is not.</STRONG>
Evolution (or the deity of your choice) has seen to that. We are supposed to look and to like what we see. Yes, women are more attractive than men.Originally posted by Vivien:
<STRONG>Georgi:
As to why women don't look at men the same way, I believe it's because the attractors are different. Natural Selectionally speaking, women look for the best provider. Before women realized that they were more than equal, the prime concern was the well being of her children. You guys look at his clothes and his car for your signals! Originally posted by Weasel:
<STRONG>quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking is fine. Leering is not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I was doing...looking
How do you define leering?
If I look for...5 seconds. Looking?
If I look for...10 seconds. Looking?
If I look for...30 seconds. Leering?
What if I look three times (at 10 seconds each time) Looking?</STRONG>
I think that some women do this, but there are many that do not. What's is the point of being with a well-dressed guy in a nice car if he's a worthless human being? A flashy car and expensive clothing can also indicate a preoccupation with oneself, this is not (IMHO) an attractive quality.You guys look at his clothes and his car for your signals!
1.Length of time on certain area's... (Weasel's self test....failedOriginally posted by Vivien:
<STRONG>
But in general it's not length of time. It's how long his eyes rest on certain body parts, if an evil gleam comes into his eyes, or if he drools.
</STRONG>
) ) ) I read a theory about the "bumps," once. It went something like this: in the beginning (no I'm not going there) humans did it doggie-style. Therefore the sight of butt cleavage was arousing. The women who got the most attention were the ones whose breasts most resembled the globes of the gluteus (they were attractive coming and going).Originally posted by Vivien:
<STRONG>
Saigo: We're dressing for other women too you know
So, do you know why men look at women more than women look at men? Is it the extra bumps women have?</STRONG>
I agree, dw! Those are examples of women's attractors, but we know that it's what's inside that that will make us stay!Originally posted by dragon wench:
<STRONG>I think that some women do this, but there are many that do not. What's is the point of being with a well-dressed guy in a nice car if he's a worthless human being? A flashy car and expensive clothing can also indicate a preoccupation with oneself, this is not (IMHO) an attractive quality.</STRONG>
Actually, those who study Human Evolution generally agree that there may have been some sexual selection for the female, er... bumps. Just like bright tail feathers in some male birds... So, once again, the men can be blamed....Originally posted by Saigo:
<STRONG>I read a theory about the "bumps," once. It went something like this: in the beginning (no I'm not going there) humans did it doggie-style. Therefore the sight of butt cleavage was arousing. The women who got the most attention were the ones whose breasts most resembled the globes of the gluteus (they were attractive coming and going).</STRONG>
Originally posted by Gwalchmai:
<STRONG>Actually, those who study Human Evolution generally agree that there may have been some sexual selection for the female, er... bumps. Just like bright tail feathers in some male birds... So, once again, the men can be blamed....
So I take it then that us women don't need any excuses?You men try to come up with all sorts of silly explanations for your attraction. It's making me laugh
Actually, it was my female biological anthropology professor who suggested I do a paper on sexual selection and the human female bumps. I ended up declining, and doing a paper on something else.Originally posted by Vivien:
<STRONG>
You men try to come up with all sorts of silly explanations for your attraction. It's making me laugh
