Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2001 8:18 am
Because it was stapled to the chicken in front???
The Internet's authoritative role-playing game forum.
https://gamebanshee.com/forums/
Originally posted by Pat Bou:
And why are so many thief players think a mage, spec. mage, sorceror or druid would walk around without Stoneskin or Ironskin always on? One backstab attempt of the thief and one skin out of 8 is gone. Period. Continguencies have nothing to do with this. It's only later in the duel that the continguency would kick in. I agree that it may be futile at that point (if you hit me, even with continguency, I'm dead). But then, I have 8 rounds to act and react before my stoneskin fails. And I can cast another one before the first drops... just to be sure I'm never caught naked.
yours rowdin??Originally posted by ROWDIN:
why did the chicken cross the road.
Breath man!Originally posted by Gruntboy:
What if? What if? What if?
What if Rail backstabs, sneaks, backstabs till you run out of stoneskins?
What if you don't have stoneskin?
What if you had to pay for your spell components and couldn't aford stoneskin? What if, as a sorcerer, you didn't have access to stoneskin?
Are you trying to flame me?Originally posted by Gruntboy:
@pat bou - good idea. End this cr*p once and for all.
Of course, once my level 1 kobold shaman got in there, you'd be crying over your level 21 corpse as I desecrated itPack your bags and go home, the smelly kobold shaman rules all-comers.
I understand. I just wanted to make you do it again 'cos it seems to get your goat.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
Please understand that this has been explained many times now (the stoneskin issue vs backstab). If the whole thread has been read before Rail gives me that strategy, then he would have kept the thought to himself, knowing what the sorceror can do.
Right back at ya. I get fed up of this "my choice is better than your choice" rubbish.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
so you must understand how fed up I can be or repeating the same thing.
I lost count of your if's in this post.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
There are no what if.
Basic? Disagree. Fairly high level? Yes.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
(its one of the most BASIC spells of BG2).
Yes you would. IF not high enough level or IF no boots of speed.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
And no, I wouldn't run out of skins.
Originally posted by Pat Bou:
Read the post about my Spell Triger
I can wear what I want. It takes a few seconds to swap. And what if I've got it in on anyway? Doesn't that defeat all your naff spells? And what if you've not got true sight on because your not expecting a thief because you don't consider them to be a threat?Originally posted by Pat Bou:
Now don't tell me you have the cloak of mirroring, because you don't : you have the cloak of non-detection.
No. You don't seem able to do that. Even the Inquisitor has a tough time agaisnt you.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
I can admit when I'm defeated.
Frankly I don't know why I'm bothering. You've just got my back up now. This whole exercise seem utterly pointless and is just a continuation of the "I made better choices than you" concept.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
But please don't think the thief can be a problem, unless you come up with a more interesting strategy.
Nah. Not worth the time. Good luck with the gladiator idea though, I'm sure lots of people will show up with cloaks of mirroring to test your theory.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
That is actually good to talk about this and find some more strategies.
I wasn't trying to flame you there. I have other posts in a thread about insanely powerful characters - its a relation to that. It is a good ideas, seriosly. Now my last post, that's a flame.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
Are you trying to flame me?
My fire extinguisher is very good and the sprinklers are showering me right now...
So long. Keep up the good work!
You're putting too much pressure on yourself. My girlfriend can do the job. Other than make me sick, you don't achieve anything.Originally posted by Gruntboy:
I understand. I just wanted to make you do it again 'cos it seems to get your goat.
So don't read the post. You actually have to click on it to read it. It's not like I'm imposing you anything or polluting your precious screen.Originally posted by Gruntboy:
Right back at ya. I get fed up of this "my choice is better than your choice" rubbish.
You're just telling us you can't count to 3.Originally posted by Gruntboy:
I lost count of your if's in this post.
Are we actually playing the same game?Originally posted by Gruntboy:
Basic? Disagree. Fairly high level? Yes.
Where were you the past few days?Originally posted by Gruntboy:
Yes you would. IF not high enough level or IF no boots of speed.
Actually, swapping cloaks in combat situation is cheesy. Guess you are.Originally posted by Gruntboy:
I can wear what I want. It takes a few seconds to swap. And what if I've got it in on anyway? Doesn't that defeat all your naff spells? And what if you've not got true sight on because your not expecting a thief because you don't consider them to be a threat?
Do you read?Originally posted by Gruntboy:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Pat Bou:
I can admit when I'm defeated.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. You don't seem able to do that. Even the Inquisitor has a tough time agaisnt you.
Not worth your time. So don't spend it even replying to us. A lot of people like this discussion so far. Again, bug off if it doesn't suits you.Originally posted by Gruntboy:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Pat Bou:
That is actually good to talk about this and find some more strategies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah. Not worth the time.
I love it when people shoot themselves in the foot.Originally posted by Pat Bou:
I finally succeed... using cheesy tactics).
You are so out of arguments.Originally posted by Gruntboy:
I love it when people shoot themselves in the foot.
I'm tempted to give you my counter-strategy. But the atmosphere is really not good at this time on the forum and I fear I would be misunderstood.Originally posted by ROWDIN:
the thing about beening a good pc is to have
no weaknesses. a pure blooded mage has no combat ability, bad hit points, and bad armour class. If you meet a boy who can get past your magic protection you will lose.my 9,20 bersreker, celric, can do just that. Has he's a higher level spell caster than you. so if your saying that your spell caster can win most of the time making him
the best your wrong. and i won't be using the flail of ages, you could'nt beat me once without combat ability. yours rowdin