Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2002 4:05 pm
I saw the video of Harry Potter the other night. I know everyone else has already seen this movie, but I don't get out much, so I have to get the videos of everything...
I liked it more than I thought I would. I was disappointed that it wasn't shown in at least letterbox format - I think all videos should go to this format. What's the use of a director using the wide-screen theater format to film his movie only to have it cut down to fill a TV screen?
I would never watch Lawrence of Arabia on TV!
Harry Potter was a good adaptation of the book, which I found surprising. Child acting usually bothers me (except Jodi Foster, whom I had a crush on when I was 10 years old!), but not so much in this. I especially liked the kid who played Ron. He had the perfect expression for the part!
I thought the CGI of the troll and broomstick flying was very convincing, while the CGI of the centaur lacked something. I've never seen a convincing centaur in the movies. I wonder why?
Any way, I felt like mentioning that I have finally seen it.![Smile :)](./images/smilies/)
I liked it more than I thought I would. I was disappointed that it wasn't shown in at least letterbox format - I think all videos should go to this format. What's the use of a director using the wide-screen theater format to film his movie only to have it cut down to fill a TV screen?
Harry Potter was a good adaptation of the book, which I found surprising. Child acting usually bothers me (except Jodi Foster, whom I had a crush on when I was 10 years old!), but not so much in this. I especially liked the kid who played Ron. He had the perfect expression for the part!
I thought the CGI of the troll and broomstick flying was very convincing, while the CGI of the centaur lacked something. I've never seen a convincing centaur in the movies. I wonder why?
Any way, I felt like mentioning that I have finally seen it.