Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

Anyone played without using Magic?

This forum is to be used for all discussions pertaining to BioWare's Baldur's Gate and Baldur's Gate: Tales of the Sword Coast expansion pack.
User avatar
mr_sir
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by mr_sir »

All +1 and +2 armour is in theory magical since the +1/+2 is the magical enhancement on the armour so this may be a good basis to use. Ankheg armour is +2 so this would explain why the ring does not work with it.
User avatar
wise grimwald
Posts: 861
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 am
Contact:

Post by wise grimwald »

There is still the anomally that in Tutu you can wear a +2 ring with Plate +3, and in BG1 it is impossible. "Curiouser and curiouser" said Alice.
User avatar
CFM
Posts: 546
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 10:03 am
Location: Detroit, MI USA
Contact:

Post by CFM »

Grombag wrote:Actually no you can't. Tried it yesterday in easy tutu and you can't equip it. I'm pretty sure this also goes for plain BG.
Maybe I'm remembering wearing a protection item with Full Plate instead? Too bad, to me it's composition would make sense that it's an amazingly hard light armor, without magic.

I'd guess it all comes down to various behind-the-scenes flags being set appropriately (or not) for each object, when the game was being developed. For example, I've read before that some obviously-evil non-joinable characters are setup as Lawful Good alignment. Doesn't effect anything, until you cast Know Alignment.
Kipi wrote:Just curious, but how would you explain that small ring gives you boost in protection without magic?
Never said the ring wasn't magical. "...for Ankheg Plate Armor I absolutely vote It's NOT Magic."
Why is it that whenever I finally get around to playing a new game for the first time,
I feel like playing Baldur's Gate for the second time...
Post Reply