Page 3 of 3

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2001 1:31 pm
by Weasel
Originally posted by Sloanzilla:
<STRONG>I think you should be allowed 10 rings of the ram- one for each finger.</STRONG>
As I said in your game you should be allowed to do this. :D I don't see the fun in it, but how do I know what is fun for you. I have read post before where people have wiped out every person in Athkatla....why...for fun. :eek: :D I personally don't think it's fun but I see no reason to complain about them doing it.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2001 1:38 pm
by Aegon
OK, this is the last time I try to defend someone else's alleged cheese. Sloanzilla, you're on your own. :eek:

Please note, however, that calling folks "cheesy" or "cheaters" often evokes their anger.

"If I want your opinion, I'll beat it out of you."
Lone Wolf McQuade

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2001 1:43 pm
by Weasel
Originally posted by Aegon:
<STRONG>OK, this is the last time I try to defend someone else's alleged cheese. Sloanzilla, you're on your own. :eek:

Please note, however, that calling folks "cheesy" or "cheaters" often evokes their anger.

"If I want your opinion, I'll beat it out of you."
Lone Wolf McQuade</STRONG>
Name calling is the main thing. Some will say 'I'm only calling a book by it's cover', maybe they need to instead explain to the person why it's looked down on.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2001 2:17 pm
by Craig
\\\\\\|||||||||||||||||||//////
\\\\\\|||||||||||||||||||//////
\\\\\\|||||||||||||||||||//////
\\\\\\T-U-R-N U-N-D-E-A-D//////
//////|||||||||||||||||||\\\\\\
//////|||||||||||||||||||\\\\\\
//////|||||||||||||||||||\\\\\\
//////|||||||||||||||||||\\\\\\

[ 07-07-2001: Message edited by: craig ]

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2001 2:36 pm
by Fezek
Hey just think if your character was Mr.T? Think what you could put on him. Sheesh he'd have his own adventure mart on each finger as well as his neck. And,Metatron, I've just done a test at home and I can wear at least three rings on each of my fingers, so there is nothing wrong or remotely cheesy with having thirty Gaxx rings. :D

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2001 12:47 am
by Xyx
The three-rings-on-every-finger issue would be a GUI nightmare... PnP has no such silly restrictions as far as I know of.

Question: Why would a Mage be able to have more weapons on hand than a Fighter/Mage/Thief..?

Answer: Because your screen isn't big enough... :rolleyes:

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2001 7:57 am
by Metatron
There is a PnP rule that states you can only have one magic ring on each hand. The game reasoning is that having more would cause the magics to interfere with eachother and therefore provde no benefit to your character. Of course, the real reason is that letting characters have three rings on each finger would seriously disturb game balance.

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:46 pm
by Fezek
Sorry. The Mr.T/three rings on each finger/look like adventure mart thing was joke. I wrote so others might "joke" as well. It wasn't meant to be serious.

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2001 5:50 pm
by Weasel
Originally posted by Fezek:
<STRONG>Sorry. The Mr.T/three rings on each finger/look like adventure mart thing was joke. I wrote so others might "joke" as well. It wasn't meant to be serious.</STRONG>
I had figured it was a joke. :) :)