Do you think the sith lords (the true Sith) in KOTOR 3 should have the darth title or not? Since it is stated in the wiki that the darth title hadn't existed for long when Revan took the title and if the true sith were in existence for thousands of years, then maybe they didn't use it.
All am asking is, would you prefer to have SIth lords with names such as e.g, Exar Kun, Marka Ragnos or Naga Sadow, or would you like their names to come with the Darth title? Or would you like to be no Sith lords at all?
Post what you think.
Darth vs No Darth
-
Darth Shishio
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:00 am
- Contact:
-
Darth Valthri
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: I live inside your mind.
- Contact:
Darth, definitely. as far as i'm concerned, "Darth", the Force, and lightsabers are what make Star Wars what it is. with only 2 out of 3 of those, Star Wars wouldn't be what it is now. take out all 3, and it's just another random sci-fi story. i firmly believe the enemy should be a Darth. if there's no Darth title, it's basically just someone who steps up and claims themself to be a Sith Lord. people like Vader, Sidious, Revan, Malak, and all them were actually part of something big when they became Darths. Exar Kun, along with other un-Darthed characters, are just kinda there.
"You see, the war, the true war, has never been one waged by droids, warships, or soldiers. They are but crude matter, obstacles against which we test ourselves." -Kreia, 3,951 BBY
-
GOOD BOY TOBI
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 4:56 pm
- Location: evil organization hideout
- Contact:
i really would like to fight a mixture of darth and no darths i mean i believe the non darths like exar kun would be kool to fight but you need to keep the classic darth in there i mean star wars and darth go together like pie and chicken 
you know when you find out the imaginary voices in your head aren't imaginary...... you finally wake up and listen and it just proves .... it pays to be parranoid