Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

Chance to learn spell?

This forum is to be used for all discussions pertaining to BioWare's Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bruce Lee
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Lund, Skane, Sweden
Contact:

Chance to learn spell?

Post by Bruce Lee »

This seems to be malfunctioning. I have a gnome illusionist and he has 95% chance to learn spell but he fails to copy one out of three. In theory he should fail one in twenty but he is nowhere near that. Which factors come into play when scribing scrolls?
Has anyone else noticed the amount of failed scribing?
You can't handle the truth!
User avatar
Edwin
Posts: 930
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 11:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Edwin »

I also noticed this....i think the computer does what he want here.... :(
Edwin, mighty founder of the Council of Mages; Co-founder of the Shadow Mages

Sorcery and Shadow together as one, the arcane and the dark united. Through our knowledge and skill none can stand against us. We are as one, infallible and invincible. The Shadow Mages.
User avatar
rapier
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2000 11:00 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by rapier »

Yes, scribing spells fails far to often, with a 85 percent chance I failed 5 out of 10...
Visit
[url="http://www.fanfiction.net"]www.fanfiction.net[/url]
User avatar
Loredweller
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Post by Loredweller »

I even suspect the program gets the seed for random number calculation from system clock. There are times you're failing every throw and times you never miss in spell learning.
However in the light of theory all is right. It's illusion you should hit 9 of 10, if probability is 90%. The events are independent in fact, and there should be number of throws great enough to be sure that it would be about theoretical.
L.

[ 04-11-2001: Message edited by: Loredweller ]
Loredweller

-------------------
...for tomorrow never comes ...
User avatar
C Elegans
Posts: 9935
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: The space within
Contact:

Post by C Elegans »

I have also noticed that the failure rate seems much higher that expected. Of course you need quite a large sample to really evaluate if the rate is too low or not, but so far I think it seems unlikely that my mage with 5% failure rate should miss about 30%. Anyway there seems to be a linearity, so when I use potions to rise his INT, he misses less often, although still more often than expected. So what I do is to save all important spells until I find a potion of Mindfocusing of Genius, then I scribe them all at once.
"There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance." - Hippocrates
Moderator of Planescape: Torment, Diablo I & II and Dungeon Siege forums
User avatar
Sojourner
Posts: 3084
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 11:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Sojourner »

IMO, the random number calculation is stacked against you. Even when I used SK to boost the INT to 25, theoretically giving me a 100% chance to scribe a spell, I still saw a high failure rate.
There's nothing a little poison couldn't cure...

What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
User avatar
Steve
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post by Steve »

This pissed me off in no time at all. so I set the game to auto-succeed every scroll. It saves time, money and many Strokes, Headaches and Smashed Keyboards.
User avatar
Sojourner
Posts: 3084
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 11:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Sojourner »

That's what I did, too. It's better than having to buy a new computer. :D
There's nothing a little poison couldn't cure...

What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
User avatar
Loredweller
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Post by Loredweller »

Hey, there's another thing, though i cannot explain mechanics (i do not know them, i only guess). It's the same thing, i guess, because 100%+ stealth fails and 100%+ pickpocketing is going caught.
IMO, every spell has its own roll dice, what may depend on the level, school - your and spell's and etc. (who knows the mind of development team?) Note, here *always* is at least 1% chance of failure, or so it is said. So, when all dices are rolled, you may fail. As analogy: your 100% is something like your THAC0, but item has its AC and, maybe, even saving throw.
Just guessing,
L.
Loredweller

-------------------
...for tomorrow never comes ...
User avatar
Bruce Lee
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Lund, Skane, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Bruce Lee »

The only thing good about this is that it gives the sorceror an advantage... I want to play on normal difficulty but it is very frustating to fail learning spells all the time.
Does anyone know if what you are wearing effects it at all?
You can't handle the truth!
User avatar
Loredweller
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Post by Loredweller »

No item gives high INT, only potions. There is also stated in manual the wisdom should have some impact, though. Well, my elf mage/cleric (19 DEX, 18 INT and WIS, the rest what spares, hard with HP, though) have little problems. Happens, however, i have to reload.
They have removed books, what a pity.
L.

[ 04-12-2001: Message edited by: Loredweller ]
Loredweller

-------------------
...for tomorrow never comes ...
Post Reply