Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

IWD1 vs. IWD2

This forum is to be used for all discussions pertaining to Black Isle Studios' Icewind Dale and its Heart of Winter and Trials of the Luremaster expansions.
Post Reply
User avatar
krunchyfrogg
Posts: 542
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 12:19 am
Location: NY
Contact:

IWD1 vs. IWD2

Post by krunchyfrogg »

Which do you prefer and why?
A life is not important, except in the impact it has on other lives.
- Jackie Robinson
User avatar
Patrick
Posts: 922
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 3:38 am
Location: Phoenix
Contact:

Post by Patrick »

I love the third edition rules implemented into the the IceWInd Dale 2 series. I also like the Herart of Fury mod. Fun game. I think some one reminds me of myself at the Targos Gates. A little reangerly fellow.
I like IceWInd Dale too. Both expansions, Heart of Winter and Trials of the Luremaster.
I love the Forgotten Realms campaing as a sorce, learned here at Black Isle Bioware. Sound Tracks are great too for both games.
Screamming!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Endugu
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 4:49 am
Contact:

Post by Endugu »

Short answer: Icewind Dale incl. Heart Of Winter and Trials Of The Luremaster, because it has (to me) a superior atmosphere and it feels like the designers cared about the game and put more effort into it.

Long answer: Well, Ill simply quote my answer from another thread (which I cant seem to find) about a similar topic:
[...] As Ive already written, I prefer the predecessor over its sequel.
This is partly due to the things already mentioned by others, i.e. weird villain dialogues, which are absent in Icewind Dale.
I also somehow like the 2nd Edition AD&D rules more than the new ones, perhaps because I tend to focus more on the characters and the game itself instead of the mechanics behind it ("which feats are the most useful?") and the balancing.

Anyway, overall I think Icewind Dale has a much more intense atmosphere than its sequel: Everything (locations, enemies, music) fits together and feels more "nordic" than in Icewind Dale 2. This has probably to do with Icewind Dale 2's plot that leads you to many different locations (underdark, Targos, chult, fellwood etc) instead of focusing more on the spine of the world and its dungeons. In this case, I think less variation is actualy a good thing and helps to create a specific atmosphere.
Thats not to say that Icewind Dale doesnt have variety! The Dragon's Eye, forlorn mountain temples, ancient elven and dwarven ruins, glaciers, barbarian camps, burial isles etc are all there - but those are locations that are more tuned to the spirit of the place instead of having variety for variety's sake.
On the same note, the encounters in Icewind Dale are more interesting to me, because they, too, fit the setting (see a pattern here?) and somehow "make sense", i.e. they are for the most time not just a bunch of seemingly random selected monsters that are thrown at the party, like Icewind Dale 2 sometimes does (but there it is perhaps partly due to the storyline).

Besides that, I find Icewind Dale 2 to be much more "over the top" in regards to magic and fantasy, which, if you are someone who dislikes "high magic" settings like me, is not something you can look forward to.
I dont know if this is at least partly because of the 3rd Edition D&D rules, the inclusion of subraces (both are absent from Icewind Dale) or simply the designer's decisions to "top" its prequel...but you wont find as much teleporting goblin hordes, demons, dragons and such in the first game. Instead its more about battling orcs, trolls, undead, yuan-ti and the like. One could say its more "classic dungeon crawl" in this aspect. At least in the beginning.
Oh yeah, there are also fewer outdoor locations than in Icewind Dale 2, but not that many.

The storyline itself is much more local instead of Icewind Dale 2's epic "save the world from the gathered armies of the enemies". Of course, the fate of the north is still in your hands - but this time, the enemy is much more subtle in his scheming.

'nuff said? :D


Seeing that you've posted this also on the IWD2 boards, Im curious; what is your opinion, kruchyfrogg? :)
User avatar
Kipi
Posts: 4969
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 6:57 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Kipi »

Well, this is actually very hard question.

I would say IWD2 since it has better rulesystem, and plot is better.

BUT, IWD1 is more funny to play again and again, since there is no such stupid "prologue" chapter which is long, boring etc. like IWD2 has.

But if I must choose, I would say IWD2, nevertheless.
"As we all know, holy men were born during Christmas...
Like mr. Holopainen over there!"
- Marco Hietala, the bass player of Nightwish
User avatar
krunchyfrogg
Posts: 542
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 12:19 am
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by krunchyfrogg »

[QUOTE=Endugu]

Seeing that you've posted this also on the IWD2 boards, Im curious; what is your opinion, kruchyfrogg? :) [/QUOTE]
I think I like IWD1 better: I'm a bigger fan of 2nd Edition rules (I grew up on those!). I also think the story is better, but I haven't finished either game yet.
A life is not important, except in the impact it has on other lives.
- Jackie Robinson
Post Reply