Thanks
Maggie
I'd generally agree with that, except (maybe) for the inclusion of Icewind DaleGilliatt wrote:Hi Maggie. Welcome to GameBanshee!![]()
So if you are more into action RPGs, you should forget about most of the suggestions that have been made (like Baldur's Gate, Fallout, Arcanum, Planescape Torment, and Icewind Dale).
I almost made another paragraph for Icewind Dale.dragon wench wrote:I'd generally agree with that, except (maybe) for the inclusion of Icewind Dale![]()
Yes, there is a pretty good story background, but it is, nonetheless, very heavily based on combat and strategy. You also are able to entirely create your own party, which can be quite a lot of fun, in and of itself.
Personally, I prefer the more story-heavy RPGs, but every so often I'll fire up IWD1, it's lots of fun when you are in a hack&slash kind of mood![]()
I'd call the IWD series RPG-flavored strategy titles. They're very linear, and most chapters are focused on a goal/goals that are pretty clear from the start. There is no party interaction, as your party members have no "character;" you generate them, yourself.Gilliatt wrote:I almost made another paragraph for Icewind Dale.I was not sure where to put it, but finally felt it belonged more to the "real" RPGs than to the action RPGs, although I would not be as polite as you were when describing the story of Icewind Dale. My opinion would be closer to "What? There was a story?"
![]()
lol!Gilliatt wrote:I almost made another paragraph for Icewind Dale.I was not sure where to put it, but finally felt it belonged more to the "real" RPGs than to the action RPGs, although I would not be as polite as you were when describing the story of Icewind Dale. My opinion would be closer to "What? There was a story?"
![]()
I did not meant that IWD was bad, it was kind of fun, although nothing compared to BG and PS:T. But the story was very cliché and simple.dragon wench wrote:lol!
Well yes, I suppose I was polite...![]()
Seriously, you are right, but in comparison to certain newer "RPGs" that shall remain nameless... IWD doesn't look that bad![]()
I agree with you 100 %Gilliatt wrote:I did not meant that IWD was bad, it was kind of fun, although nothing compared to BG and PS:T. But the story was very cliché and simple.
I know how you feel. I have a friend who is a huge Diablo fan. I bought him the whole Baldur's Gate series for his birthday last year and he did not even finished BG 1. Too slow for him and too much landscapes without monsters and loot.dragon wench wrote:I agree with you 100 %![]()
Indeed, I am currently replaying PS:T and enjoying every minute, to the point where I'm actually "level grinding" just so that I can delay going to the the final sections..... I just don't want it to end *sniffs*
It is a game I would have heartily recommended to Maggie had she not specified that she prefers more action-oriented RPGs.