hehe... my l33t english skillz arent that l33t...Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>The what???![]()
</STRONG>
In sweden if your grades suck you can take a test to prove you are worthy of higher education...
and im so scared
hehe... my l33t english skillz arent that l33t...Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>The what???![]()
</STRONG>
OK, so your definition of spirituality does not necessarily involve transcendent aspects?Originally posted by der Moench:
<STRONG>Your second question is answered by your last: what is the nature of sprituality: PHILOSOPHY! So, please, do not apologize for becoming philosophical: it is your only path to true spirituality!</STRONG>
Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>What education have you applied to and how high result do you need?</STRONG>
Absolutely not! No, you need no higher power; you need nothing outside of yourself to be spiritual. It is an intensely and completely personal and individual thing.Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>OK, so your definition of spirituality does not necessarily involve transcendent aspects?</STRONG>
</STRONG>by Georgi:
<STRONG>Hmmm. I would say definitely spiritual, possibly religious...
LOLOriginally posted by Dottie:
<STRONG>In sweden if your grades suck you can take a test to prove you are worthy of higher education...
</STRONG>
That sounds very likely to meOriginally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>Hm, I wonder if the difference is more on an interpretation level - ie it might be similar experiences but people chose different concepts depending on their own reference system? </STRONG>
Opportunist!Originally posted by Dottie:
<STRONG>
i will not apply to anything untill next year, and then i will judge from my resluts exactly what to apply to.
And what is this with mr sleep btw?
like i havent guessed alredy![]()
![]()
</STRONG>
Well, I AM, after all, a beer-brewing monk! Nothing goes quite so well with a beer and a philosophical discussion than a good pipe!Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>Interesting behaviour, for a monk...![]()
</STRONG>
</STRONG>by Sleep:
<STRONG>Propalactics?
Ah - that means you agree with some other papers I'm reading about the development of the concept about spirituality, whereas the temporal lobe people use the word to denote a mystic meaning - spiritual and mystic seem synonymous.Originally posted by der Moench:
<STRONG>Absolutely not! No, you need no higher power; you need nothing outside of yourself to be spiritual. It is an intensely and completely personal and individual thing.
</STRONG>
LOL! The love that dare not speak its nameLove for sheep can express itself in many ways...and Sleep and Weasel have experienced most
Yes, but WHY would one brew it without drinking it!? It's God's work, and I feel closer to Him when I have a good pint in my hand!Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>LOLBut you could brew it without drinking it...
![]()
![]()
@CE very delicate explanation there![]()
</STRONG>
</STRONG>Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>That sounds very likely to me![]()
@CE very delicate explanation there
Spiritual and mystic are NOT synonymous. IMHO. Let me back-track and explain somewhat further:Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>Ah - that means you agree with some other papers I'm reading about the development of the concept about spirituality, whereas the temporal lobe people use the word to denote a mystic meaning - spiritual and mystic seem synonymous.</STRONG>