proficiencies
- firewings95
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2001 11:00 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
proficiencies
there are sword and shield, two handed weapon style, one handed weapon style, and dual weild style i think.
i'm so confused. and maybe a little dumbfounded.
what weapons go with these proficiencies? (ex. crossbows)
can someone give me a list of all the weapons in the game and linked them with there proficiencies. thanks.
i'm so confused. and maybe a little dumbfounded.
what weapons go with these proficiencies? (ex. crossbows)
can someone give me a list of all the weapons in the game and linked them with there proficiencies. thanks.
- Impaler987
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 9:57 pm
- Contact:
Missile weapons (bows, crossbows, darts, slings) aren't affected at all by any of those proficiencies.
Two-handed weapon style affects two-handed swords, spears, quarterstaffs, and halberds.
Sword-and-shield style is for added bonuses when wielding a one-handed melee weapon together with a shield. Pretty worthless actually, IMO.
Single weapon style works with one-handed melee weapons without a shield or second weapon. Useful for thieves and bards, who cannot use shields or dual-wield (except swashbucklers and blades).
Two-weapon style is pretty self-explanatory. Two one-handed melee weapons, one in each hand.
Oh, and you still need to put proficiency slots in individual weapons to use them effectively. These styles are no substitutes for learning individual weapons.
Two-handed weapon style affects two-handed swords, spears, quarterstaffs, and halberds.
Sword-and-shield style is for added bonuses when wielding a one-handed melee weapon together with a shield. Pretty worthless actually, IMO.
Single weapon style works with one-handed melee weapons without a shield or second weapon. Useful for thieves and bards, who cannot use shields or dual-wield (except swashbucklers and blades).
Two-weapon style is pretty self-explanatory. Two one-handed melee weapons, one in each hand.
Oh, and you still need to put proficiency slots in individual weapons to use them effectively. These styles are no substitutes for learning individual weapons.
The weapon styles are not linked to a particualr weapon.
You choose them dependent on how you use the weapon:
1) Two Handed: Better speed and increased chance of critical strike with any 2-handed melee weapon (i.e. Spear, 2-Handed Sword)
2)One Handed: AC-bonus when using a 1-handed melee weapon (Long Sword, Dagger... ), but only if you are neither using a second weapon nor a shield
3)Sword and Shield: AC-Bonus vs missile weapons if you are using a 1-handed weapon (not necessarily a sword) and a shield
4)Dual Wield: Decreases your off-hand weapon's THACO malus
The proficiencies that directly affect weapons are named after their weapons class (i.e Long Sword, Sling, Katana etc. )
You choose them dependent on how you use the weapon:
1) Two Handed: Better speed and increased chance of critical strike with any 2-handed melee weapon (i.e. Spear, 2-Handed Sword)
2)One Handed: AC-bonus when using a 1-handed melee weapon (Long Sword, Dagger... ), but only if you are neither using a second weapon nor a shield
3)Sword and Shield: AC-Bonus vs missile weapons if you are using a 1-handed weapon (not necessarily a sword) and a shield
4)Dual Wield: Decreases your off-hand weapon's THACO malus
The proficiencies that directly affect weapons are named after their weapons class (i.e Long Sword, Sling, Katana etc. )
There are three kinds of people that no one understands: geniuses, madmen and guys that mumble.
- firewings95
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2001 11:00 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
Thats because of his class. Since he's a Illusionist/Thief, he cant put more than one "+" into anything. Only Fighters can reach Grand Mastery (+++++). Paladins, Rangers, Barbarians, Multi classed figthers and the thief subclass Swashbuckler can be proficient in a weapon (++).
All other classes (Thief, Mage, Sorceror, Bard, Monk, Cleric, Druid) are limited to one point.
All other classes (Thief, Mage, Sorceror, Bard, Monk, Cleric, Druid) are limited to one point.
There are three kinds of people that no one understands: geniuses, madmen and guys that mumble.
- fable
- Posts: 30676
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
- Contact:
Originally posted by garazdawi
which is a good choice considering that no Mage ever (except Gandalf) is a good swordfighter
According to whom? Offhand, I can think of many fantasy novels by different authors (The Incomplete Enchanter, The Well of the Unicorn, The Green Pearl, The Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser series, The Worm Ouroboros, for starters) whose mages ranged from good to great at swordfighting--and that's just the tip: there are easily several dozen I could list if I bothered to take the time. You youngins have to start reading something other than that endless cookie cutter stuff ground out by thirdrate hacks using somebody else's rules and worlds! Look to the best fantasy composed over the last fifty years, and you'd be surprised at the resuts.
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
- Phantom Lord
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Exiled - yet ...
- Contact:
According to me , and indeed I just realised my folly when I saw the new whhel of time book in the book store..... fighter mages make for great people and Rand Al'Thor with themOriginally posted by fable
According to whom?
"Those who control the past control the future, those who control the present control the past" And I rule the PRESENT!!
I put the 'laughter' back in 'slaughter'
I put the 'laughter' back in 'slaughter'
- fable
- Posts: 30676
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
- Contact:
Originally posted by garazdawi
According to me , and indeed I just realised my folly when I saw the new whhel of time book in the book store..... fighter mages make for great people and Rand Al'Thor with them
Don't think of the Wheel of Time as though it represents all of fantasy. Dig into the stuff that predates AD&D's chokehold on fiction. There's some superb fantasy out there made in distinctive universes that (gasp!) never even considered using anybody's rulebook.
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
- Phantom Lord
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Exiled - yet ...
- Contact:
- Taco Magus
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:41 am
- Location: FL
- Contact:
you know one time i tried to use my hide in shadows abilite on my boss...it did not work =\
Dungeon Crawl Inc. Bruoght to you by GB's own Kayless
"This is between us and the chickens, ma'am, and im going to ask
real nicely that you stay out of it" -Child of Baal
"This is between us and the chickens, ma'am, and im going to ask
real nicely that you stay out of it" -Child of Baal
- fable
- Posts: 30676
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
- Contact:
I think my favorite protagonist (note: not fighter who casts spells or mage with a sword--that's thinking inside the box) in a fantasy novel who exercises a range of skills is the hero to the Incomplete Enchanter series. He's a young scientist stuck in a government-funded hush-hush research program in Nebraska, slowly being bored out of his mind. As a result, he actually thinks that the right combination of spell attributes can send someone into an alternate universe for which the gateway is a book or mythos. He things he can find a date and some red-headed action by visiting the Irish myths, only he miscalculates and discovers himself at the start of Ragnarok. Great stuff, as he learns to wield magical swords and discovers he has an aptitude for casting spells.
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
I just took it as an example..... I know there are several other....Belgariad...Malloreon....Elenien.....Tamuli....etc all are great booksOriginally posted by fable
Don't think of the Wheel of Time as though it represents all of fantasy. Dig into the stuff that predates AD&D's chokehold on fiction. There's some superb fantasy out there made in distinctive universes that (gasp!) never even considered using anybody's rulebook.
@Phantom Lord I've read until number seven in that series.....It's great....BTW do u know how many books there really are??? or hasn't he finished writing it yet as Robert Jordan???
"Those who control the past control the future, those who control the present control the past" And I rule the PRESENT!!
I put the 'laughter' back in 'slaughter'
I put the 'laughter' back in 'slaughter'
- UserUnfriendly
- Posts: 4109
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Sluggy Zone
- Contact:
le sprage de camp....and i think fletcher pratt is co author....
look for the incomplete enchanter, the complete enchanter...
fighter mages are the best most cheesy class to play...sola for example, with moonbeam reward is awesomely powerful....
tho sorc kensais are better...hehhehehh
look for the incomplete enchanter, the complete enchanter...
fighter mages are the best most cheesy class to play...sola for example, with moonbeam reward is awesomely powerful....
tho sorc kensais are better...hehhehehh
They call me Darth...
Darth Gizka!
Muwahahahahhahahha!!!
Darth Gizka!
Muwahahahahhahahha!!!
- serjeLeBlade
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:55 pm
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Originally posted by Bruce Lee
Sounds interesting fable... Author? Title? I am always on the lookout for good reading
Authors: L. Sprangue De Camp & Fletcher Pratt
Protagonist: Harold Shea
Rating: As good as the Fafhrd and Gray mouser cycle of Fritz Leiber imho (which is an "A" imho)
@Fable: what about using names in your post? I had to read it two times before I realized what you were talking about!
In Italy taht book is called "Il castello d'acciaio"... (The steel castle).
Where we came from, we don't know
Where we're going.... (even worse)
And about who we could be, we actually have trouble in clearly defining the term "to be" in the first place...
Where we're going.... (even worse)
And about who we could be, we actually have trouble in clearly defining the term "to be" in the first place...
- Phantom Lord
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Exiled - yet ...
- Contact: