@Scayde: As I have tasted of the fruits of your hunting, I must say you went the extra mile in ensuring the deer you killed was taken out properly, and processed the right way. The venison we had not too long ago was awesome, the best I ever had.

*hug*
@Ned: Oddly enough, I don't see whale mentioned here. As anyone who has tasted a whale steak will attest, it's better than beef. Really, it's true. Not too long ago I read a National Geographic article pertaining to the survival of the great whales, which are not in danger of extinction from being hunted...rather, their populations are not being managed properly. A rather controversial zoologist suggested that with the proper education, whaling countries could get a handle on what species they hunt at particular times of the year, allowing for herds to compensate for the loss of population during periods when they were not "in season." This makes alot of sense if you think about it. Plus, the guy made a great point: one whale can yield over 40 tons of meat. Damn. That's a helluva lot of burger in the freezer, man.
EDIT: Okay, some clarifying is in order here.

Whereas deer and smaller mammals need a breeding season to recover from hunting (which, as we know, simulates predation and attrition that would otherwise occur naturally in their population, were the country more like a Druid's paradise), whales need more time to breed and grow. I think the scientists were basing their opinions on data currently being collected concerning the whale population in the planet's oceans...which apparently is not as sparse as was previously believed. Based on what they were saying, Blue Whale season would last for about 5 years or so, then lapse into a safe zone of about 10 to 15 years while they recovered. In the meantime, other whale species could be hunted while those behemoths squeezed out more baby whales.
