The level of spam

Taco Magus · Post by **Taco Magus** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:41 pm

heh scayde, has anyone told u how evil you are lately?

Scayde · Post by **Scayde** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:43 pm

Originally posted by Taco Magus
heh scayde, has anyone told u how evil you are lately?

LOL.....Taco....You're such a sweetalker

Taco Magus · Post by **Taco Magus** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:44 pm

Originally posted by Scayde
LOL.....Taco....You're such a sweetalker

*smiles bashfully* why is it you always say that when we start to spam?

Grendel · Post by **Grendel** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:53 pm

I was just pondering one of lifes imponderables...which chromosome encodes the spam gene? Assuming it is not a complex multigene syndrome and the trait is due to a single gene then where is it? Can't be the Y chromosome since girls can do it too (girls don't have a "Y" in case ya'll forgot your Biology). Could be autosomal (non-sex chromosome linked) but then I got to thinking, do girls do it better/more? Perhaps dosage-linked in which case it is on the X chromosome (girls are XX, boys are XY).....

Scayde · Post by **Scayde** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 4:04 pm

Originally posted by Grendel
I was just pondering one of lifes imponderables...which chromosome encodes the spam gene? Assuming it is not a complex multigene syndrome and the trait is due to a single gene then where is it? Can't be the Y chromosome since girls can do it too (girls don't have a "Y" in case ya'll forgot your Biology). Could be autosomal (non-sex chromosome linked) but then I got to thinking, do girls do it better/more? Perhaps dosage-linked in which case it is on the X chromosome (girls are XX, boys are XY).....

LOL......if this is the case, everything must be linked to the x chromosome

Taco Magus · Post by **Taco Magus** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 4:09 pm

i think it has to do with the B chromosome.

Bordem

Bloodstalker · Post by **Bloodstalker** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 4:23 pm

Originally posted by Scayde
LOL....I suggest locking him in a thread with BS and Georgi until he is completely assimilated into the art of spam

I grow weary of this statement...but:

I DO NOT SPAM

Taco Magus · Post by **Taco Magus** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 4:24 pm

Originally posted by Bloodstalker
I grow weary of this statement...but:

I DO NOT SPAM

you know denial is the 1st sign of addiction

Bloodstalker · Post by **Bloodstalker** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 4:25 pm

Originally posted by Taco Magus
you know denial is the 1st sign of addiction

Isn't your burrito missing you about now?

Grendel · Post by **Grendel** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 4:26 pm

Well as I recall, channel changing, refusing to ask navigation questions and barbequing have for sure been linked to the Y chromosome. Love of shopping and (I think) nagging mapped to the X. Boredom is indeed autosomal but can be overriden by gain of function channel changing, BBQing, shopping or nagging (at least in part)

@ Scayde You will of course have noted the qualifier in there, DO??

Girls probably do do everything better with the notable exception of getting horribly lost and refusing to ask for directions....

Scayde · Post by **Scayde** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:56 pm

Originally posted by Grendel
Well as I recall, channel changing, refusing to ask navigation questions and barbequing have for sure been linked to the Y chromosome. Love of shopping and (I think) nagging mapped to the X. Boredom is indeed autosomal but can be overriden by gain of function channel changing, BBQing, shopping or nagging (at least in part)

@ Scayde You will of course have noted the qualifier in there, DO??

Girls probably do do everything better with the notable exception of getting horribly lost and refusing to ask for directions....

LOL......Mmmm...I don't know, I may have been mistaken, it seems smoothe talking may also be linked to the Y chromosome

Scayde · Post by **Scayde** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:57 pm

Originally posted by Bloodstalker
I grow weary of this statement...but:

I DO NOT SPAM

Bloodstalker
Exalted Member

Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Nadine, honey is that you?
Posts: 11704

LOL......You mind if I put that in my sig

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 6:13 pm

Originally posted by Scayde
LOL....I suggest locking him in a thread with BS and Georgi until he is completely assimilated into the art of spam

But... but... I don't want to be locked in a thread with BS...

Scayde · Post by **Scayde** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 6:21 pm

Originally posted by Georgi
But... but... I don't want to be locked in a thread with BS...

Strange....that wasn't the part he was complaining about

Taco Magus · Post by **Taco Magus** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 6:32 pm

i wouldnt complain about that either

Bloodstalker · Post by **Bloodstalker** » Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:16 pm

Ok, Georgi has made her token statement of resistance to the idea, you can lock me in with her now

Chanak · Post by **Chanak** » Tue Aug 26, 2003 5:02 am

I say we should conduct a funeral service for Spam.

Tamerlane · Post by **Tamerlane** » Tue Aug 26, 2003 5:21 am

Originally posted by Chanak
I say we should conduct a funeral service for Spam.

Whats with your obsession with funerals. I've already attended two Chanak inspired funerals

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Tue Aug 26, 2003 5:53 am

Originally posted by Scayde
Strange....that wasn't the part he was complaining about

What a surprise.

Originally posted by Bloodstalker
Ok, Georgi has made her token statement of resistance to the idea, you can lock me in with her now

It wasn't a token statement, it was an expression of deepfelt horror.

Originally posted by Tamerlane
Whats with your obsession with funerals. I've already attended two Chanak inspired funerals

Then stop encouraging him!

Maharlika · Post by **Maharlika** » Tue Aug 26, 2003 7:12 pm

The embers of COMM is still hot!

Originally posted by Chanak
I say we should conduct a funeral service for Spam.

...say, who would be the Undertaker?