Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

Would you Die for Your Principles?

Anything goes... just keep it clean.
User avatar
ik911
Posts: 4248
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 1:43 pm
Location: Having an alibi.

Post by ik911 »

[QUOTE=Magrus]Nopity. Must perform in an excellent manner, unless BS doesn't want the job. Me thinks he'd be perfect for it...[/QUOTE]
Yes, that would be a logical choice since he's retiring... yup. uh-huh. yes. very well.

Oh, maybe I should add that this is meant in some kind of ironical sarcastic way? Nah, forget about it.
[size=-1]An optimist is a badly informed pessimist.[/size]
User avatar
Magrus
Posts: 16963
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:10 am
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by Magrus »

[QUOTE=ik911]Yes, that would be a logical choice since he's retiring... yup. uh-huh. yes. very well.

Oh, maybe I should add that this is meant in some kind of ironical sarcastic way? Nah, forget about it.[/QUOTE]

Sarcasm? Here? Oh no! *runs away* :eek:
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
User avatar
Obsidian
Posts: 1619
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2001 11:00 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by Obsidian »

[QUOTE=dragon wench]My question is: If somebody is coerced into a joining a repugnant movement are they morally justified? Similarly, can somebody be excused for heinous acts because they were simply "following orders?"

Would it be more moral to stand up for what you believe in and refuse to act or join, even if that means certain death?[/QUOTE]

No, speaking as a soldier, you are allowed, to disobey an order if it violates your ethics, and are required to refuse an order if it is illegal according to the Geneva convention.

"I was only following orders" is not a defense under military law.

[QUOTE=Magrus] Joining, training and taking out half a squad at the first opportunity they deploy you to do acts your against, now that is a death worth your life IMO.[/QUOTE]

And when the rest of the section caught up to you, you would die a horrible, horrible death.

Would I die for what I believe? I'd risk my life for it, thats certain. Would I kill for it? Now that's a better question, any fool can die.
The waves came crashing in like blindness.
So I just stood and listened.
User avatar
Magrus
Posts: 16963
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:10 am
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by Magrus »

[QUOTE=Obsidian]And when the rest of the section caught up to you, you would die a horrible, horrible death.

Would I die for what I believe? I'd risk my life for it, thats certain. Would I kill for it? Now that's a better question, any fool can die.[/QUOTE]

Isn't that what any soldier risks going into battle? Capture and torture, or a bullet and death? Who's to say that group wouldn't torture me for resisting in the first place? Better to infiltrate and do as much damage as possible as a method of resistance than to just stand and be shot down. Yes, I'd kill for some of my beliefs, to protect innocents.
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
User avatar
Cuchulain82
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: Law School library, Vermont, USA
Contact:

Post by Cuchulain82 »

If this discussion illustrates anything, isn't it the incredible nuance that comes with any life/death decision? I think the decision one makes is based heavily on the situation itself.
Custodia legis
User avatar
stormcloud
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 9:29 am
Contact:

Post by stormcloud »

I'd say no, but it depends how extreme the situations are.

As for the pope question, its been proven that children are much more susceptible to joining stupid organizations ie brainwashing.

But adults should know better. As for people just following orders, we put a high emphasis on responsibility for physical actions, such as being at a death camp. So if you're only "mentally" at a death camp (ie supporting nazis), I guess its not as bad.

Personally, if commies are nazis came to my door and said "believe in this", I'd have no problems with it. If they put a gun in my hand and tell me to shoot someone, well i think I'd have a problem with it.

So the big issue is death of others/innocents. And I dont know how I'd react. But does anyone until they are actually there?
"Learn to know the dark side of the Force and you achieve a power greater than any Jedi..."
User avatar
Locke Da'averan
Posts: 2782
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Between North Pole and South pole, on the surface
Contact:

Post by Locke Da'averan »

alot has changed from 3years past hmm*reads the previous post in the original thread..*.. i don't think i'd be willing to die atm for almost anything.. except the obvious ones..(world peace)etc. but if someone hurted/killed my loved ones, i'd die to get revenge
User avatar
Cuchulain82
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: Law School library, Vermont, USA
Contact:

Post by Cuchulain82 »

[QUOTE=stormcloud]I'd say no, but it depends how extreme the situations are.[/QUOTE]
You're a black and white kinda person, huh stormcloud?
Custodia legis
User avatar
dragon wench
Posts: 19609
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: The maelstrom where chaos merges with lucidity
Contact:

Post by dragon wench »

[QUOTE=Cuchulain82]If this discussion illustrates anything, isn't it the incredible nuance that comes with any life/death decision? I think the decision one makes is based heavily on the situation itself.[/QUOTE]

I think this statement probably encapsulates the entire question.
I have thought a lot about whether or not I would be willing to die for my beliefs.. And it is fine, subtle line.

If I were told that I had to personally harm others as a result of having been involuntarily "recruited" by some sort of extremist organisation I think I would say, "Yes, I would die for my principles." One, I could not live with myself on any kind of ethical level. Two, to endure such a horrific existence... countless nightmares and memories of heinous acts I had perpetrated... would be far, far worse than death.

But, if it were more the case that I was required to nod my head to any such group, providing just implicit support, I would pause. In such an event, what end would my death serve? How could I be useful to those I care about? How could I be useful in fighting for what I believe? Further, if I elected to remain alive, there would still be the possibility of passing along information to a group struggling against whatever organisation it happened to be.
Spoiler
testingtest12
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Spoiler
testingtest12
.......All those moments ... will be lost ... in time ... like tears in rain.
User avatar
stormcloud
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 9:29 am
Contact:

Post by stormcloud »

[QUOTE=Cuchulain82]You're a black and white kinda person, huh stormcloud?[/QUOTE]

Actually no. I now believe every situation is unique.

Unless you were being facetious.

:P
"Learn to know the dark side of the Force and you achieve a power greater than any Jedi..."
User avatar
Locke Da'averan
Posts: 2782
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Between North Pole and South pole, on the surface
Contact:

Post by Locke Da'averan »

[QUOTE=Magrus]Isn't that what any soldier risks going into battle? Capture and torture, or a bullet and death? Who's to say that group wouldn't torture me for resisting in the first place? Better to infiltrate and do as much damage as possible as a method of resistance than to just stand and be shot down. Yes, I'd kill for some of my beliefs, to protect innocents.[/QUOTE]

there's the unique reflex everyone faces when facing mortal danger.. some freeze, some berserk, some keep it together etc.. (i haven't been in live fire war or had to kill anyone) in the end the survival instinct kicks in and you do almost anything just to survive.. of course this doesn't apply to all.
User avatar
Cuchulain82
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: Law School library, Vermont, USA
Contact:

Post by Cuchulain82 »

[QUOTE=stormcloud]Actually no. I now believe every situation is unique.

Unless you were being facetious. :P [/QUOTE]
No, actually I was being serious. I only ask because in the last few threads when I've said something about nuance or subjectivity or something, you usually disagree with me pretty quickly. I was just curious... :)
Custodia legis
User avatar
stormcloud
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 9:29 am
Contact:

Post by stormcloud »

sorry, i was replying to the OP and not meaning to refute your claims. my replies are usually @ the OP and not you. any semblance is circumstantial.

and honestly, i dont have a bone to pick with most anyone. the way i see it is everyone has experiences and preferences that we can all learn from; you can even learn things from the ones you dont agree with.
"Learn to know the dark side of the Force and you achieve a power greater than any Jedi..."
User avatar
Cuchulain82
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: Law School library, Vermont, USA
Contact:

Post by Cuchulain82 »

I like reading what you have to say, and you happened to reply to a lot of what I've said today. I didn't mean that I had a problem with what you were saying or that I felt like you were picking on me- I was just wondering about your perspective. No harm, no foul... just discussion :)
Custodia legis
User avatar
winter rose
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:56 pm
Contact:

Post by winter rose »

[QUOTE=Xandax]Easy to say when they are abstract and hypothetical .... it is with all due likelyhood much harder to do when real.[/QUOTE]

Wrong.Most beliefs/ principles of ours are challenged at one point or another in our lives. They are rarely abstract and hypothetical.Im assuming that if we hold certain principles- we also apply them to our lives.
A rose to her heart that heaven might bless.
User avatar
C Elegans
Posts: 9935
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: The space within
Contact:

Post by C Elegans »

[QUOTE=Cuchulain82]For centuries "real freedom" has been synonimous with the "American style" of freedom[/QUOTE]

In America maybe - not necessarily in the rest of the world. The US type of freedom is based on positive freedom whereas there are other types based more on negative freedom and you also have combined efforts.

[quote="winter rose]
Im assuming that if we hold certain principles- we also apply them to our lives.[/quote"]

I agree with you that people should (what's the use of principles otherwise?) but you'd be surprised if you knew how common it is where I live that people, especially younger ones, express a lot of opinions but act in an inconsistent way. Like "I'm a vegatarian but I eat sushi because I like it" if you see what I mean. Opportunism, failure to assess long term consequences correctly and false self image are very common reasons for people not to act by what they believe are their principles in theory.

EDIT: I'm so tired I forgot to answer the original question :D Well, I still stand by what I wrote in the old thread.
"There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance." - Hippocrates
Moderator of Planescape: Torment, Diablo I & II and Dungeon Siege forums
User avatar
frogus23
Posts: 421
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 2:10 pm
Location: Rock 'n Roll Highschool
Contact:

Post by frogus23 »

[QUOTE=C Elegans]The US type of freedom is based on positive freedom whereas there are other types based more on negative freedom and you also have combined efforts.[/QUOTE]I don't know if we just have a different idea about what its like in the US, but "rugged individualism", private sector public services, low taxes, rights to free speech & bear arms etc. are all definitive characteristics of what is normally called 'negative liberty', not positive. However it's not a desperately interesting discussion and not really relvent here...

Would I die for my pronciples?

I think this question is nonsense on stilts - as Cuchullain has suggested.
-Nobody can name a precise list of what 'MY PRINCIPLES' are.
-Not all principles are worth dying for. What about the principle that no human should die deliberately? The principle of life? The principle that vegemite is better than marmite?
-It is impossible to predict whether one's own death is going to have the effect one expects, and therefore it is impossible to predict if one is actually dying for one's principles, or inadvertently for something else, or for nothing at all.
-The psychology of a person faced directly and certainly with death is so far removed from that of everyday people that predictions about yourself (if you are not a Black Thief who has faced certain death before) in these situations lack all traces of credibility or verificability.
SYMISTANI COMMUNIST
User avatar
C Elegans
Posts: 9935
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: The space within
Contact:

Post by C Elegans »

[QUOTE=frogus23]I don't know if we just have a different idea about what its like in the US, but "rugged individualism", private sector public services, low taxes, rights to free speech & bear arms etc. are all definitive characteristics of what is normally called 'negative liberty', not positive. However it's not a desperately interesting discussion and not really relvent here...[/quote]

I'm probably just mixing them up, I have worked 14-16 hours a day or more for 14 days in a row now so I am totally exhausted.

US type of freedom = no obstacles, same type as a lonely person at a remote island, the person is not constrained, but the actual reportoire of actions the person can do, is limited

Other major type of freedom = the possibility to actually do something, for instance get an education, often associated with the Scandinavian countries
"There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance." - Hippocrates
Moderator of Planescape: Torment, Diablo I & II and Dungeon Siege forums
User avatar
Xandax
Posts: 14151
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Xandax »

[QUOTE=winter rose]Wrong.Most beliefs/ principles of ours are challenged at one point or another in our lives. They are rarely abstract and hypothetical.Im assuming that if we hold certain principles- we also apply them to our lives.[/QUOTE]

Well - have you defined your principles into a list which you are ready to die for?

One of my principles I live by, is try to be as nice to other people as I can... would I die for it? Heck no.
If somebody came up to me and said that I should stop opening doors for strangers, or they would kill me ... I'd stop in an instance. Eventhough it would go against a principle of mine.

Another principle is trying to be as thoughtfull as possible about what I read/hear/see in the medias. Would I die for that? No way.

Would I die if my country got invaded by the Swedes and they wanted to turn us all into slave? Likely not, but I'd fight to avoid it and then death would be a possible outcome. I wouldn't die for it, but I would fight for it.

Now - naturally these example is a bit "far fetched", but it only goes to show, the point I had. It is easy to sit here abstract and hypothetical and debate these things.

And a very good statement by Frogus, which I feel my opinion mirros nicely:

[QUOTE=Froggy Man]I think this question is nonsense on stilts - as Cuchullain has suggested.
-Nobody can name a precise list of what 'MY PRINCIPLES' are.
-Not all principles are worth dying for. What about the principle that no human should die deliberately? The principle of life? The principle that vegemite is better than marmite?
-It is impossible to predict whether one's own death is going to have the effect one expects, and therefore it is impossible to predict if one is actually dying for one's principles, or inadvertently for something else, or for nothing at all.
-The psychology of a person faced directly and certainly with death is so far removed from that of everyday people that predictions about yourself (if you are not a Black Thief who has faced certain death before) in these situations lack all traces of credibility or verificability.[/QUOTE]


I think a better question would be wether or not you'd fight for your principles then if you'd die for them.
Insert signature here.
User avatar
ik911
Posts: 4248
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 1:43 pm
Location: Having an alibi.

Post by ik911 »

[QUOTE=Xandax]I think a better question would be wether or not you'd fight for your principles then if you'd die for them.[/QUOTE]Not really, because as CE already mentioned, what are principles for if you don't use them? In other words: principles are the reasons you'd fight. Without principles I don't think there'd be any use in fighting.
Instead, the question would be: are your principles realistic? But how would one know? As remarked often in this thread, it's almost impossible to predict how you're going to react in extreme situations.
[size=-1]An optimist is a badly informed pessimist.[/size]
Post Reply