@ Xandax: Dune is one of the best s.f. books I ever read. What about "the godmakers".
The movie... hhmm... well, it was good, but De Laurentis having control over the production kinda screwed David Lynch's efforts. And they left too much out. All the intrigue and the ecological stuff where puffed away
------------------
They can only kill me with golden bullet !
"The Deed is Done" -- Hanzo Hattori
Hail to The KidD ! Champion of Spam, The Dark Lord of Spamsters !
Originally posted by Xandax: @Ubik: haven't read "Godmakers" - also a F.Herbert book?
Yes and it is brilliant - about a society who is producing a new religion, complete with it's god. Very good work.
@Weasel: Philip Jose Farmer is a very good writer.
@All: Check out Alfred Bester. He has wrote the book that gave me the most strong emotional reactions ever. It is called "Tiger, Tiger" and it's simply a masterpiece - IMHO ofcourse
Originally posted by FoulDwimmerlaik:
I don't read. In fact, the last book I remember reading, I didn't actually read; it was read to me by my mother when I was three.
Originally posted by Melosh-tar: Henry Turtledove, Bernard Cornwell, Tolken, Playboy, just for the articles, a lot of those magazines have very FINE ARTICLES.
Well I do lots of reading all day long at work since I have a monotonous telemarketing job, reading news on the web, sports scores, Gamebanshee forums, etc., so when I get home at night I'm an awfully sluggish reader. But when I'm in school I'm a pretty studious bookworm. I guess the books I'm presently tackling would be Jared Diamond's wonderful and easily-readable Pulitzer winner "Guns, Germs, and Steel", Hunter S. Thompson's "Great Shark Hunt", and tonnes of mediaeval Latin that is driving me insane. Diamond's treatise brilliantly deals with all of world history in a Toynbee-esque attempt at explaining why the powers of the world are who they are, i.e. the West ruling over the rest. It's probably a good foil for all this Machiavelli talk, the Great Man theory of history being put up against Diamond's physiological and scientific explanation for all things historic. He argues quite well that Eurasia was able to ascertain its dominance all throughout history due to its common land mass and the easy distribution of domesticated animals and crops. Also, and I got a kick out of this, he attributes Eurasians' relative immunity to disease to the deplorable and inhumane conditions under which the "civilized" world has always lived. The book has been almost as mind-blowing as "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" was the first time I read it. As for Machiavelli, you guys know who he really was/is, right? That's right, Niccolo is none other than Ol' Nick, the Devil, Satan, Child of Bhaal! Bwahahahaha
I see the right, and I approve it too; condemn the wrong and yet the wrong pursue.
Well I must say that after reading some Machiavelli - his ideas dosen't sound all that bad. One have to remember the time they were written, political climate; military status and so on.
I must say, wich I've done in some classes at university, that some of his ideas can actually be used in for instance the buisness world (wich I feel a great interest in - hey just because, I'm going to switch education, dosen't mean I'll leave buisness/economics alone)
So good ole machiavelli is actually quite an intersting character.
@ Saigo have you read the sequel to the Alienist? It's called the Angel of Death..good book
[url="http://www.gamebanshee.com"]GameBanshee[/url] Make your gaming scream! "I have seen them/I have watched them all fall/I have been them/I have watched myself crawl" "I will only complicate you/Trust in me and fall as well" "Quiet time...no more whine"