VonDondu wrote:Keline, I won't argue with your assertion that "16 is a dumb teenager barely out of puberty, trying to get laid just to feel good about herself". I certainly didn't feel that way about myself when I was 16, but like I said, I won't argue with you about that point.
When you were 16 ?! Honestly, do you really think we should let minors do everything they think they can do? You're giving them way too much credit here.
However, I wonder what makes you think that a 22-year-old guy is any more deserving of the right to do as he pleases than a 16-year-old?
His parents are no longer responsible for him. The only person responsible for him right now is he himself. I think that's a pretty solid reason right there.
I think you greatly overestimate the value of "maturity and experience".
On the contrary, the value maturity and experience can't possibly be overestimated.
Let's go through all the information we have, right?
She does not know his name.
She does not know where he lives.
She does not know his number.
Yet she would like to have sex with him, apparently completly ignorant of possible consequences. Is this the decision of someone who has experience or has put thought into it?
If she ends up pregnant, where will he be? Not within a hundred miles if he gets wind of it. Not within reach since she has no information about him.
Yet she wants his cock. If this is a mature young woman to you, fine. To me it's a dumb teenager. Definatly not someone who should bear children at this point.
Exactly stories like this are the reason we have an influx of underage mothers. Truely horrible sex ed (thanks to the neoconserfascists for that one), laws that ban the sales of contraception to minors on the one hand, Hollywood pumping out movies that tell you "get laid or be a loser" like American Pie, MTV broadcasting about no other subject than "hos" and whatnot on the other. So where exactly should she take the experience from you seem to believe she has?