Richard "Lord British" Garriott Interview
-
Category: InterviewsHits: 4247
Article Index
GB: First of all, let's go back twenty-five years. What originally influenced your decision to become a game developer? Was Akalabeth your very first attempt at creating a game?
Richard: I started writing small games in 1974. The first few were (Star Trek) style simple games, then I quickly moved to a series of tiny games I called D&D 1 through D&D 28 (I was a big D&D fan, as you can see.) Each was written in Basic, on a teletype terminal connected via an acoustic modem to a mini-computer offsite from my school. But even then they looked a lot like what would eventually become Ultima, but with (*)'s for walls, ($) for treasure and letters for creatures ((B) was a giant bat for example.) You moved around and fought monsters and collected treasure. Then I discovered the Apple II, specifically the one that is still functioning outside my office. That's when I began the Ultima series. with (real) graphics!
GB: What exactly was California Pacific Computer and how were you involved with the company? What events took place that put the remaining Ultima titles under the Origin Systems umbrella instead?
Richard: California Pacific (discovered) my first game that I was self-publishing at the time by putting some in Ziploc bags at my local computer shop. They distributed it nationally, sold thirty-thousand units and paid me five dollars per unit. For a high school senior the one hundred fifty-thousand dollar income for six weeks of after school work was a pretty good payoff! So I decided to make more! Eventually CP went under, but that began the road which lead to my brother Robert and I creating Origin, as we felt we could run a business at least as well as the guys who ran these other businesses.
GB: The fourth Ultima is considered one of the finest in the series because it was the first to feature the now-famous virtue system. Where did this idea originate from and how did it influence the remaining Ultima titles for years to come?
Richard: When I was creating Ultima IV, I was worried that it would be a flop. I labored over the virtues to the degree that I felt no one would understand or appreciate. It grew out of a response to the flak RPG's get by religious extremists who decry RPGs as (the devils work.) I had noticed that most RPGs have the same boring, morally ambiguous plot: (You are supposed to be the hero. Go kill the bad guy,) but most players pillage and plunder in order to gain the power required to kill the (bad guy) who has done nothing active in the game but wait for you to come kill him. Players are, in fact, usually the (evil) force. So I decided to make a game that tested IF you really were a good or evil character. Most players began playing in their old ways until they realized they were going downhill due to their behavior and quickly responded, happily amazed at the hidden tests that affected their gameplay.
GB: Why was Ultima VII presented as two separate titles (The Black Gate and Serpent Isle)? Why do you think this installment in particular has garnered so much fan support to this day?
Richard: Honestly Ultima VII: Part 2 was an afterthought. We had built the U7 engine which we felt was very capable and deep, but only lightly (exercised) in Part 1. So we decided to let the designers loose to more fully exploit story telling and interaction in what I think is the best Ultima engine for its day.
GB: After developing so many party-based Ultima titles (III-VII), why was the decision made to allow players to control only the Avatar in Ultima VIII and IX? Do you think this decision hurt these final two games commercially?
Richard: I think the simulated party had benefits and deep costs as well.
GB: When did you originally consider the idea of creating a persistent online RPG in the Ultima universe? What sort of challenges did you find yourself up against to make Ultima Online a reality?
Richard: We had talked about it for many years before starting it. We even tried to contract such a game out on a few occasions, but since there were no examples of the success metrics that would be required to invest at the level we wanted to, it was hard to get buy in for it. Only after many attempts did we get the green light for UO.
GB: Before we move on to Tabula Rasa, are there any memorable experiences working on the Ultima series that you can share with us?
Richard: Frankly, there are too many to tell but as a generality, getting to work with the great developers I have through the years and seeing the results of our work in the players' hands has been incredibly rewarding.
GB: After leaving Origin Systems, why did you choose to create a sci-fi MMORPG? Had you considered doing something similar to Tabula Rasa while you were still at OSI?
Richard: The one thing I was NOT going to do next was medieval fantasy (although that may be next after TR) and, yes, I had a skunk works idea to do a game structured somewhat like TR long before we got started.
GB: Tell us about your decision earlier this year to take the development of Tabula Rasa in a new direction. What was it about the game's original concept that you felt needed to be altered?
Richard: When we began TR, the name was indicative of our thinking. (Tabula Rasa) means (blank slate) and that is where we started. We did not want to pattern our game after any known genre or IP that we had seen before. We wanted to be as (new) as possible, as original as possible. While that worked great in some areas, like some of the gameplay innovations I am very proud of, it failed in certain other areas, like visuals; especially in the area of character visuals. We created very (fanciful) new attire for our characters. but in the end, no one desired to wear it! When looking at it, people would say it looked cool but to wear it meant it had to embody what you wanted to be and we failed to reach that goal. So, we rebuilt our visuals, particularly character visuals, on something that was an easier step to make for most people. We are now VERY pleased with our look and feel and know the fresh new game play TR offers will attract many new players.
GB: Has a lot of work been put into the history and lore surrounding the game? Can we expect plenty of background information about the game's factions, etc?
Richard: Of course! It would not be a Lord British Game without it!
GB: How will character creation and advancement work in the game? Will we be picking a specific class for a character or will advancement be entirely skill-based? What is this "save-and-revert" advancement system we've heard about?
Richard: I don't like that most games make you choose things like race and class before you have even played the game so you have no idea why you might prefer one over the other. In TR, you will play the game as a (recruit) and experience gameplay. Then later you make a set of branching decisions through your character's advancement. Similarly, in most games when you decide to go back and try another class you have to start over, which we don't agree with. In our case, a class is like a license: You can always go back and change careers at any place in your personal history you want. That way you can explore the whole class tree without starting from scratch!
GB: How combat-oriented is Tabula Rasa? Can a player advance their character without participating in combat?
Richard: TR is fundamentally a combat game, much more so than say UO. Still, there are a few non-combat activities in the game, but not the whole other lifestyles as UO had. I believe the quality of combat, and the depth of our storytelling will satisfy players.
GB: What sort of futuristic weapons and armor will we have at our disposal in Tabula Rasa? Will we also be able to do battle with any spell-like abilities?
Richard: Players begin TR with relatively familiar weapons and slowly move to exotic relics discovered as remnants of the aliens we interact with. In addition to weapons your have alien powers called Logos. But, you'll have to play to know more details!
GB: Finally, what do you feel gives Tabula Rasa its appeal and sets it apart from other MMORPGs currently on the market?
Richard: There are two main areas of innovation that I think will attract people to TR in high numbers: 1) Our fast-paced combat that looks a lot like a shooter, but is really a stats and equipment-based RPG. While it's hard to describe in a few words, I think it plays great! 2) Our rich storytelling, akin to solo player RPGs. In TR, we use (private spaces) like you would find in a solo player game to do rich storytelling not often found in other MMPs.
Thanks for your time, Richard!
